Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
WotC Walks Back Some OGL Changes, But Not All
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hatmatter" data-source="post: 8895089" data-attributes="member: 75077"><p>Well, those people are likely as responsible (perhaps) for the retraction and amendments as they were for the initial draft. To be honest with you, I have always felt like the OGL and Wizards's willingness to make its documents available for free on the website (like the most basic version of its rules or the adventures they published online during the pandemic) was very generous and not comparable to the holder of any other intellectual property that I can think of. I can't imagine Disney (which I like) permitting a third party publisher to publish a Wolverine comic, for example.</p><p></p><p>I am torn in two in feeling ways that run in two different directions:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">I primarily yearn for D&D to be doing great and for the game and books and culture to be as good and as healthy as possible. To see the role-playing game community go nuclear over this is what really troubles me. I just want people happy: third party creators as well as the designers as Wizards of the Coast, who are the custodians of the games mechanics in the 21st century. This is NOT a criticism of anyone. I simply grieve because division, arguments, bickering, etc. has happened so often in the past and it was making me so happy to see the hobby doing so well these past ten years.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">I admire those who have spoken out strongly against the OGL changes in order to fight for the free circulation and publication of ideas. At the same time, I respect Wizards of the Coast and Hasbro for being willing to make revisions that acknowledge those objections, even in the face of (no doubt) constant pressure to produce a favorable bottom line (a treacherous path that many amateur designers and probably all players do not have to negotiate).</li> </ol><p>Cheers everyone! I have always valued Enworld. Hopefully we can all (including Wizards of the Coast) navigate this imbroglio within our community while maintaining respect for each other intact.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hatmatter, post: 8895089, member: 75077"] Well, those people are likely as responsible (perhaps) for the retraction and amendments as they were for the initial draft. To be honest with you, I have always felt like the OGL and Wizards's willingness to make its documents available for free on the website (like the most basic version of its rules or the adventures they published online during the pandemic) was very generous and not comparable to the holder of any other intellectual property that I can think of. I can't imagine Disney (which I like) permitting a third party publisher to publish a Wolverine comic, for example. I am torn in two in feeling ways that run in two different directions: [LIST=1] [*]I primarily yearn for D&D to be doing great and for the game and books and culture to be as good and as healthy as possible. To see the role-playing game community go nuclear over this is what really troubles me. I just want people happy: third party creators as well as the designers as Wizards of the Coast, who are the custodians of the games mechanics in the 21st century. This is NOT a criticism of anyone. I simply grieve because division, arguments, bickering, etc. has happened so often in the past and it was making me so happy to see the hobby doing so well these past ten years. [*]I admire those who have spoken out strongly against the OGL changes in order to fight for the free circulation and publication of ideas. At the same time, I respect Wizards of the Coast and Hasbro for being willing to make revisions that acknowledge those objections, even in the face of (no doubt) constant pressure to produce a favorable bottom line (a treacherous path that many amateur designers and probably all players do not have to negotiate). [/LIST] Cheers everyone! I have always valued Enworld. Hopefully we can all (including Wizards of the Coast) navigate this imbroglio within our community while maintaining respect for each other intact. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
WotC Walks Back Some OGL Changes, But Not All
Top