Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
WotC Walks Back Some OGL Changes, But Not All
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheSword" data-source="post: 8895523" data-attributes="member: 6879661"><p>Well I think for a small design studio $25k is quite a chunk of money but your point only makes my case that this could easily end up going in front of the courts - which is a high risk for both parties and more importantly for the community. I think in your “bring it on”, “watch the world burn” approach you’re missing the point.</p><p></p><p>We benefit from a successful D&D brand that is supported by 3pp. That’s the whole reason why the OGL was put out there. Quality content, plenty of people to play D&D with, and cool ways to play it. If D&D gets spun off into its own orbit and drags 70% of content with it as the reaction to a court case, we all lose. Those that like D&D now miss out on 3pp content. Those that like 3pp now miss out on the stuff the main brand does.</p><p></p><p>You might say bring it on, because you have nothing to risk and everything to gain. Not everyone is so blazé and disdainful.</p><p></p><p>The inability to consider the viewpoint of the other folks at the table means that the baby gets thrown out with the bathwater. Portraying WotC as an aggressor, evil or greedy is myopic. Instead of acknowledging that any company that is looking to invest and secure investment of millions in film, media and digital (which is good for the community) <strong><u>needs</u></strong> to have some control over their IP in order to secure that investment. Any successful brand also becomes a target for bad actors like NuTSR so they also <strong><u>need</u></strong> to control who and what can be published else their brand isn’t really their own. At this stage in WotC’s cycle not fixing these two problems becomes an existential issue for them.</p><p></p><p>Claiming that 3pp are being destroyed is nonsense. Folks can continue to publish without royalties, without theft of their work, pdfs and books under the OGL2.0. That in itself is extremely generous for any company who’s game is so popular. It seems people have lost sight of that in the desire hold onto the past.</p><p></p><p>If folks become so attached to a legally dubious 20 year old license and a court case is forced, either way it’s bad for the community - win or lose. The sad thing is, driven by the mob, several 3pp who have otherwise worked well in past with D&D have now shown their cards and are potentially being encouraged down a road that wouldn’t be good for them or the hobby. I don’t want to see a proliferation of d6 systems that will just fade into obscurity.</p><p></p><p>The Thousand Flowers Blooming idea is bunkum. They will get trodden on and forgotten. Give me a couple of trees instead please.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheSword, post: 8895523, member: 6879661"] Well I think for a small design studio $25k is quite a chunk of money but your point only makes my case that this could easily end up going in front of the courts - which is a high risk for both parties and more importantly for the community. I think in your “bring it on”, “watch the world burn” approach you’re missing the point. We benefit from a successful D&D brand that is supported by 3pp. That’s the whole reason why the OGL was put out there. Quality content, plenty of people to play D&D with, and cool ways to play it. If D&D gets spun off into its own orbit and drags 70% of content with it as the reaction to a court case, we all lose. Those that like D&D now miss out on 3pp content. Those that like 3pp now miss out on the stuff the main brand does. You might say bring it on, because you have nothing to risk and everything to gain. Not everyone is so blazé and disdainful. The inability to consider the viewpoint of the other folks at the table means that the baby gets thrown out with the bathwater. Portraying WotC as an aggressor, evil or greedy is myopic. Instead of acknowledging that any company that is looking to invest and secure investment of millions in film, media and digital (which is good for the community) [B][U]needs[/U][/B] to have some control over their IP in order to secure that investment. Any successful brand also becomes a target for bad actors like NuTSR so they also [B][U]need[/U][/B] to control who and what can be published else their brand isn’t really their own. At this stage in WotC’s cycle not fixing these two problems becomes an existential issue for them. Claiming that 3pp are being destroyed is nonsense. Folks can continue to publish without royalties, without theft of their work, pdfs and books under the OGL2.0. That in itself is extremely generous for any company who’s game is so popular. It seems people have lost sight of that in the desire hold onto the past. If folks become so attached to a legally dubious 20 year old license and a court case is forced, either way it’s bad for the community - win or lose. The sad thing is, driven by the mob, several 3pp who have otherwise worked well in past with D&D have now shown their cards and are potentially being encouraged down a road that wouldn’t be good for them or the hobby. I don’t want to see a proliferation of d6 systems that will just fade into obscurity. The Thousand Flowers Blooming idea is bunkum. They will get trodden on and forgotten. Give me a couple of trees instead please. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
WotC Walks Back Some OGL Changes, But Not All
Top