Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
WotC Walks Back Some OGL Changes, But Not All
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="glass" data-source="post: 8895815" data-attributes="member: 12251"><p><span style="font-size: 10px">Haven't quite read the whole thread yet, but it's bedtime and I've already amassed quite a few quotes to respond to so I will leave this here and come back to it tomorrow....</span></p><p></p><p></p><p>Everyone, every day. It is pretty much impossible to live in the modern world without doing so. That trust is not (or should not be) absolute, but it will be present.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Which makes any other change irrelevant, because anyone signing up to 2.0 under those circumstances is effectively signing up to 1.1 (except it will presumably be called 2.1) down the line.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Not open IMNSHO. AFAIAC, anything they did not explicitly walk back should be assumed to be exactly as awful as before.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I did. It was about market information and control. You don't need to collect information on people making 50k to collect royalties from people making fifteen times that much.</p><p></p><p>[HR][/HR]</p><p>Aside from that, I agree with the seeming near-consensus that this is a small step in the right direction but nowhere near enough. One line did stand out as being particularly awful (which is saying something):</p><p></p><p><em>"And third, we wanted to ensure that the OGL is for the content creator, the homebrewer, the aspiring designer, our players, and the community—not major corporations to use for their own commercial and promotional purpose."</em></p><p></p><p>Given that they are a "major corporation" (pretty much the <em>only</em> major corporation when it comes to TTRPGs), and these changes are entirely for their own (perceived) benefit, the hypocrisy is breathtaking.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="glass, post: 8895815, member: 12251"] [SIZE=2]Haven't quite read the whole thread yet, but it's bedtime and I've already amassed quite a few quotes to respond to so I will leave this here and come back to it tomorrow....[/SIZE] Everyone, every day. It is pretty much impossible to live in the modern world without doing so. That trust is not (or should not be) absolute, but it will be present. Which makes any other change irrelevant, because anyone signing up to 2.0 under those circumstances is effectively signing up to 1.1 (except it will presumably be called 2.1) down the line. Not open IMNSHO. AFAIAC, anything they did not explicitly walk back should be assumed to be exactly as awful as before. I did. It was about market information and control. You don't need to collect information on people making 50k to collect royalties from people making fifteen times that much. [HR][/HR] Aside from that, I agree with the seeming near-consensus that this is a small step in the right direction but nowhere near enough. One line did stand out as being particularly awful (which is saying something): [I]"And third, we wanted to ensure that the OGL is for the content creator, the homebrewer, the aspiring designer, our players, and the community—not major corporations to use for their own commercial and promotional purpose."[/I] Given that they are a "major corporation" (pretty much the [I]only[/I] major corporation when it comes to TTRPGs), and these changes are entirely for their own (perceived) benefit, the hypocrisy is breathtaking. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
WotC Walks Back Some OGL Changes, But Not All
Top