Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
WotC Walks Back Some OGL Changes, But Not All
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MNblockhead" data-source="post: 8909963" data-attributes="member: 6796661"><p>Sorry, but they have to sell to me. The only thing I have to negotiate it whether I find their product worth giving my money to.</p><p></p><p>I'm not howling for WotC to go up in flames. Heck, even if they just tried to revoke the OGL and tried to take back all of their IP, I might still buy WotC content. </p><p></p><p>But what more do we need to give WotC in return? They became the brand they are under the OGL. That it became the default system for third-party publishers to create TTRPG content for and for streamers to play BENEFITED WotC/Hasbro. They are doing very well. </p><p></p><p>Ultimately, I'm rather selfish about this and expressing my selfishness in the recent survey on the OGL 1.2, I believe, it more effective than crying out about the unjustness to third-party publishers. </p><p></p><p>If: </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">the new OGL and its associated SRD is far more restrictive than the OGL 1.0a</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">the "no hateful content and conduct" has a chilling effect on creative content that pushes boundries or explores areas that might invite controversy</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">features of my VTT can no longer be used for D&D games</li> </ul><p>...AND if the above leads to fewer third-party publishers making content for D&D, third-party settings I like no longer being supported, and my VTT experience with D&D being far worse than with other systems...</p><p></p><p>...THEN D&D becomes less fun and provides less of a value to me and I will increasingly look to other systems for my gaming needs. </p><p></p><p>That may mean going to another system under a true open license with a richer amount of content covered by it. It may mean going with one or more closed systems by other publishers. Probably a mix of both. </p><p></p><p>I may not stop playing D&D entirely because of this, but I can certainly see myself playing LESS D&D and increasingly playing other systems. By trying to revoke the OGL 1a, they are simply creating an opening for other competition. I don't need to give WotC anything else, they need to stop trying to take things away from me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MNblockhead, post: 8909963, member: 6796661"] Sorry, but they have to sell to me. The only thing I have to negotiate it whether I find their product worth giving my money to. I'm not howling for WotC to go up in flames. Heck, even if they just tried to revoke the OGL and tried to take back all of their IP, I might still buy WotC content. But what more do we need to give WotC in return? They became the brand they are under the OGL. That it became the default system for third-party publishers to create TTRPG content for and for streamers to play BENEFITED WotC/Hasbro. They are doing very well. Ultimately, I'm rather selfish about this and expressing my selfishness in the recent survey on the OGL 1.2, I believe, it more effective than crying out about the unjustness to third-party publishers. If: [LIST] [*]the new OGL and its associated SRD is far more restrictive than the OGL 1.0a [*]the "no hateful content and conduct" has a chilling effect on creative content that pushes boundries or explores areas that might invite controversy [*]features of my VTT can no longer be used for D&D games [/LIST] ...AND if the above leads to fewer third-party publishers making content for D&D, third-party settings I like no longer being supported, and my VTT experience with D&D being far worse than with other systems... ...THEN D&D becomes less fun and provides less of a value to me and I will increasingly look to other systems for my gaming needs. That may mean going to another system under a true open license with a richer amount of content covered by it. It may mean going with one or more closed systems by other publishers. Probably a mix of both. I may not stop playing D&D entirely because of this, but I can certainly see myself playing LESS D&D and increasingly playing other systems. By trying to revoke the OGL 1a, they are simply creating an opening for other competition. I don't need to give WotC anything else, they need to stop trying to take things away from me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
WotC Walks Back Some OGL Changes, But Not All
Top