Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lord Twig" data-source="post: 7701209" data-attributes="member: 31754">Really not understanding what your problem with the Ranger is. I think the current revision pretty clearly shows what a Ranger is as opposed to a Fighter, Barbarian or Paladin. He is a wilderness warrior and survivalist who's skills are broadly useful in any environment.Just because he learned how to sneak and ambush in the wild doesn't mean he can only sneak and ambush in the wild. A Rogue (presumably) learned to sneak in a city, but she can still sneak in a forest or a dungeon or whatever.So instead of saying why we should keep the Ranger, how about telling us why we shouldn't have a Ranger. What would be gained by having less classes to choose from?</blockquote>