Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="QuentinGeorge" data-source="post: 9237063" data-attributes="member: 20990">Yeah, I mean based on the very vague definition that is being used, the "clone stamp" is not far off being "AI". I think as long as its not stealing another artist's work (ie the training data) then it should be legit.The real solution to this, of course, is to enforce that the AI companies pay (ongoing) licensing fees for each and every single piece of art or creative work that their tools are "trained on". Of course the side effect might be completely destroying these AI generaters as viable on a financial level but...<img src="https://media4.giphy.com/media/vvuM9kHnq7Kgw/200.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></blockquote>