Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
WotC: 'We made a mistake when we said an image not AI'
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GreyLord" data-source="post: 9237066" data-attributes="member: 4348"><p>There are ways, but considering the current trends in the art community (as I understand them) they will be seen as increasingly hostile to artists seeking work or contracting. </p><p></p><p>The easiest way is to require hard copy from the artist (aka...an official painting/drawing/work...etc) from them for validation that they actually did it.</p><p></p><p>With many working only on computer tableau that would instantly be seen as controversial by many.</p><p></p><p>The problem with works that are only done via computer, however, it is getting more and more difficult to determine whether there was any AI involvement or not. As AI gets further integrated into various programs I expect this problem will only get harder to stop and/or detect.</p><p></p><p>The easiest, which is to require hardcopy with materials seen (such as paint) is probably the one where you will actually encounter more hostility in the coming days (ironically from many of those who claim they want no AI doing artwork, but ONLY do artwork via computer making things harder to tell if it is truly just the artist, or an artist with a little AI aid) rather than those who are opposed solely to AI.</p><p></p><p>Right now, the tide is strongly against AI, but I expect over the next decade (could be sooner) that AI artwork or assisted artwork will be seen as more acceptable and companies that require a hardcopy for verification that it is NOT AI or AI assisted will be taboo'ed by the very artists that currently are angry about AI.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GreyLord, post: 9237066, member: 4348"] There are ways, but considering the current trends in the art community (as I understand them) they will be seen as increasingly hostile to artists seeking work or contracting. The easiest way is to require hard copy from the artist (aka...an official painting/drawing/work...etc) from them for validation that they actually did it. With many working only on computer tableau that would instantly be seen as controversial by many. The problem with works that are only done via computer, however, it is getting more and more difficult to determine whether there was any AI involvement or not. As AI gets further integrated into various programs I expect this problem will only get harder to stop and/or detect. The easiest, which is to require hardcopy with materials seen (such as paint) is probably the one where you will actually encounter more hostility in the coming days (ironically from many of those who claim they want no AI doing artwork, but ONLY do artwork via computer making things harder to tell if it is truly just the artist, or an artist with a little AI aid) rather than those who are opposed solely to AI. Right now, the tide is strongly against AI, but I expect over the next decade (could be sooner) that AI artwork or assisted artwork will be seen as more acceptable and companies that require a hardcopy for verification that it is NOT AI or AI assisted will be taboo'ed by the very artists that currently are angry about AI. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
WotC: 'We made a mistake when we said an image not AI'
Top