Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC will likely be making a dedicated Psion class, as per recent tweets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Giltonio_Santos" data-source="post: 7865259" data-attributes="member: 36874"><p>It's not that I miss this or that promise of support, specifically. I'm not calling WotC on a failed promise to deliver epic-level play or a classed warlord. What I'm saying, and I know that this is a strong statement, is that this tent is not big <em>at all</em>.</p><p></p><p>As written, I don't feel like 5e supports more than a single playing style, the one made possible by RAW PHB. Besides that, it pays lip service to a promise of diverse gameplay with 15-20 pages of the <em>Dungeon Master's Guide</em>.</p><p></p><p>I enjoy the playing style that 5e enables, and that's why I've been playing it almost exclusively for the last 5.5 years (more, if you consider the fact that we moved to 5e more or less definitely when the last playtest was released), but can you think about people that believed WotC when they said that tactical gameplay would be a real option? If tactical gameplay was a dealbreaker for them, they probably abandoned the ship by now, but they could well have supported the edition for 1-2 years while waiting for something worth their time to appear.</p><p></p><p>I believe the same is true for almost everything we could mention as a different playing style. 5e can't do gritty properly. It can't do low-magic properly (and the rules for buying/selling magic items make it appear like it cannot do really high magic properly either). It can't do tactical properly. It can't do different technological levels. And its chief designers are shunning away from even releasing a character class that creates supernatural effects through anything that is not a spell/spell slot.</p><p></p><p>Heck, the monk in the PHB would probably fail to pass the Arcana Unearthed test in 2019. The warlock would be threatened as well. The published artificer, which is the most innovative thing to come out of WotC in the last 5.5 years, is uninspiring, to say the least. I'm the lucky guy here, some sound rules for psionics is probably the first thing I really wanted from WotC that I believe they'll fail to deliver. But big tent? Really? No, I don't think that's the case.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Giltonio_Santos, post: 7865259, member: 36874"] It's not that I miss this or that promise of support, specifically. I'm not calling WotC on a failed promise to deliver epic-level play or a classed warlord. What I'm saying, and I know that this is a strong statement, is that this tent is not big [I]at all[/I]. As written, I don't feel like 5e supports more than a single playing style, the one made possible by RAW PHB. Besides that, it pays lip service to a promise of diverse gameplay with 15-20 pages of the [I]Dungeon Master's Guide[/I]. I enjoy the playing style that 5e enables, and that's why I've been playing it almost exclusively for the last 5.5 years (more, if you consider the fact that we moved to 5e more or less definitely when the last playtest was released), but can you think about people that believed WotC when they said that tactical gameplay would be a real option? If tactical gameplay was a dealbreaker for them, they probably abandoned the ship by now, but they could well have supported the edition for 1-2 years while waiting for something worth their time to appear. I believe the same is true for almost everything we could mention as a different playing style. 5e can't do gritty properly. It can't do low-magic properly (and the rules for buying/selling magic items make it appear like it cannot do really high magic properly either). It can't do tactical properly. It can't do different technological levels. And its chief designers are shunning away from even releasing a character class that creates supernatural effects through anything that is not a spell/spell slot. Heck, the monk in the PHB would probably fail to pass the Arcana Unearthed test in 2019. The warlock would be threatened as well. The published artificer, which is the most innovative thing to come out of WotC in the last 5.5 years, is uninspiring, to say the least. I'm the lucky guy here, some sound rules for psionics is probably the first thing I really wanted from WotC that I believe they'll fail to deliver. But big tent? Really? No, I don't think that's the case. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC will likely be making a dedicated Psion class, as per recent tweets
Top