Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
WotC_Rodney: 4ed "take only what you want" monster design good
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SteveC" data-source="post: 3997082" data-attributes="member: 9053"><p>I'm not really surprised by this discussion, but at the same time I have to wonder what the thought process behind a lot of it is. The thing is, 3X monsters didn't use the same system as player characters for a lot of things, and where they intersected there were a lot of problems.</p><p></p><p>In my last game session I ran the group against a group of gray render zombies. These creatures are CR6, the same as a level six fighter, and yet have 20 Hit Dice. Those hit dice are there because they're meant to be absolute brutes of monsters, but they also give them saves of: Fort +6, Ref +5, Will +12. My group laughed because the render's reflex saves were the same of of the characters' pseudo dragon familiar. Yep that makes sense to me. On top of that, the render should have seven feats, but by virtue of being a zombie he loses all of them, and gets ... wait for it ... toughness. One toughness feat.</p><p></p><p>So that's the system as it exists now. The idea where you can have creatures with hit points by role and level, combined with racial talents can work just as well, and be just as "real" as a fully developed player character.</p><p></p><p>Why can't your player character have <strong>Awesome Blow</strong> now? Because he's not big enough! Why can't he have <strong>Powerful Charge</strong> (barring a splat book, mind you)? Because he's not a minotaur. That second one is a good example of what I expect to see in 4E over time: racial talents and abilities will gradually become talents and feats that characters can learn.</p><p></p><p>So I guess I'm at a loss to see what's so great about the current system: if you move any significant distance from the baseline, you begin to see how many of the underlying assumptions behind it don't work. Characters aren't the equivalent to monsters now, and they won't be in the next edition either. What you'll have is greater transparency behind their abilities so that John Cooper can get some well-deserved rest.</p><p></p><p>Just my $.02 ...</p><p></p><p>--Steve</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SteveC, post: 3997082, member: 9053"] I'm not really surprised by this discussion, but at the same time I have to wonder what the thought process behind a lot of it is. The thing is, 3X monsters didn't use the same system as player characters for a lot of things, and where they intersected there were a lot of problems. In my last game session I ran the group against a group of gray render zombies. These creatures are CR6, the same as a level six fighter, and yet have 20 Hit Dice. Those hit dice are there because they're meant to be absolute brutes of monsters, but they also give them saves of: Fort +6, Ref +5, Will +12. My group laughed because the render's reflex saves were the same of of the characters' pseudo dragon familiar. Yep that makes sense to me. On top of that, the render should have seven feats, but by virtue of being a zombie he loses all of them, and gets ... wait for it ... toughness. One toughness feat. So that's the system as it exists now. The idea where you can have creatures with hit points by role and level, combined with racial talents can work just as well, and be just as "real" as a fully developed player character. Why can't your player character have [B]Awesome Blow[/B] now? Because he's not big enough! Why can't he have [B]Powerful Charge[/B] (barring a splat book, mind you)? Because he's not a minotaur. That second one is a good example of what I expect to see in 4E over time: racial talents and abilities will gradually become talents and feats that characters can learn. So I guess I'm at a loss to see what's so great about the current system: if you move any significant distance from the baseline, you begin to see how many of the underlying assumptions behind it don't work. Characters aren't the equivalent to monsters now, and they won't be in the next edition either. What you'll have is greater transparency behind their abilities so that John Cooper can get some well-deserved rest. Just my $.02 ... --Steve [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
WotC_Rodney: 4ed "take only what you want" monster design good
Top