Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="humble minion" data-source="post: 4024030" data-attributes="member: 5948">Love Al-Qadim and everything to do with it.  Magnificent setting, and I'd be absolutely rapt to see it return in some form in 4e.  Hell, I was that inspired that I was about half-way through writing an Arabian Adventures supplement for a 3rd-party publisher when the company folded and left me stranded.  It's a setting that had a bit of everything, and could fit any kind of game style or campaign.But it has to be said that this really cheeses me off:I'm sure Rodney got a fair bit of pointless and personal abuse over d20SW - that's the nature of the internet sadly.  But both the initial and revised versions of d20SW (I haven't got Saga, and can't comment on that) were utter, utter pants - embarrassingly non-functional game systems that thoroughly deserved any 'decrying' they copped.  WotC and everyone involved should be ashamed of themselves for shoving such a blatantly lazy and untested game out the door.(Though having ranted, I've reread what he actually wrote and it's possible he was talking about keeping an open mind before the game hit the shelves rather than kneejerk hating it simply because WotC was making it and it wasn't d6.  Which is an entirely reasonable and common-sense attitude to take on his part.  Ahem.  Please ignore the frothing, d20SW-scarred loon in the corner...)</blockquote>