Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
WotC_Shoe: He DM's, but his pc's don't fight!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Insight" data-source="post: 4147291" data-attributes="member: 11437"><p>And again, we don't know that every skill challenge will be as open-ended as the one at the preview. My DM didn't really seem to understand how skill challenges worked all that well, so he allowed us to use any skill we had. </p><p></p><p>I didn't see the rules he was given, so I can't claim one way or the other whether or not the skill challenge was designed to be entirely open ended. Even if it was, that doesn't mean <em>every</em> skill challenge has to be completely open ended. Remember, the previews were designed specifically to showcase new stuff.</p><p></p><p>I have a feeling (and I haven't seen the rules, so, unlike some, I won't pretend to have a definitive opinion on this) that each DM will tailor his or her skill challenges a little differently. I can certainly envision scenarios where some skills simply wouldn't be appropriate, and I'm sure other posters can as well. </p><p></p><p>Also, we don't know how the resolution mechanic really works. For example, we know that there are low, medium, and high risk challenges. You (the player) decide how hard you want to make it to succeed (how much risk you want to take on). What happens if you succeed in one high risk challenge versus two low risk challenges? We don't know. </p><p></p><p>Making a blanket statement that x number of successes means that the DM's hands are tied and he has no say in the outcome is more than a little presumptive at this point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Insight, post: 4147291, member: 11437"] And again, we don't know that every skill challenge will be as open-ended as the one at the preview. My DM didn't really seem to understand how skill challenges worked all that well, so he allowed us to use any skill we had. I didn't see the rules he was given, so I can't claim one way or the other whether or not the skill challenge was designed to be entirely open ended. Even if it was, that doesn't mean [i]every[/i] skill challenge has to be completely open ended. Remember, the previews were designed specifically to showcase new stuff. I have a feeling (and I haven't seen the rules, so, unlike some, I won't pretend to have a definitive opinion on this) that each DM will tailor his or her skill challenges a little differently. I can certainly envision scenarios where some skills simply wouldn't be appropriate, and I'm sure other posters can as well. Also, we don't know how the resolution mechanic really works. For example, we know that there are low, medium, and high risk challenges. You (the player) decide how hard you want to make it to succeed (how much risk you want to take on). What happens if you succeed in one high risk challenge versus two low risk challenges? We don't know. Making a blanket statement that x number of successes means that the DM's hands are tied and he has no say in the outcome is more than a little presumptive at this point. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
WotC_Shoe: He DM's, but his pc's don't fight!
Top