Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ZeshinX" data-source="post: 7675745" data-attributes="member: 6793656">If they keep up with this D&amp;D Brand fetish, soon they'll have only one person left.&nbsp; You don't need a team to slap a logo on someone else's products.I also find the idea that satellite products will lead people back to the table top game to be, more or less, proven as not a successful approach.&nbsp; 4e tried that (at least from what my limited perceptions can tell) and the results were....well, dubious is probably the nicest way to say it.&nbsp; I have no doubt some people are led back to it...but I would have to surmise that the numbers would be pretty small (certainly not enough to put much stock in it as a successful business strategy).It really is an odd feeling to want to spend money on something, but finding there's almost nothing worth spending it on.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="ZeshinX, post: 7675745, member: 6793656"] If they keep up with this D&D Brand fetish, soon they'll have only one person left. You don't need a team to slap a logo on someone else's products. I also find the idea that satellite products will lead people back to the table top game to be, more or less, proven as not a successful approach. 4e tried that (at least from what my limited perceptions can tell) and the results were....well, dubious is probably the nicest way to say it. I have no doubt some people are led back to it...but I would have to surmise that the numbers would be pretty small (certainly not enough to put much stock in it as a successful business strategy). It really is an odd feeling to want to spend money on something, but finding there's almost nothing worth spending it on. :p [/QUOTE]

Verification