Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Arilon" data-source="post: 7655250" data-attributes="member: 1955">At this point, I would be entirely surprised if Dragonlance gets any formal treatment (beyond the meager information in the 3 rulebooks.)  WotC totally screwed over Dragonlance fans in 4e.  I don't know if it was Chris Perkins who said that there was only one good story to tell in Dragonlance, but that shows either a complete and total lack of imagination on his part, or is just a euphamistic way of telling DL fans to take a flying leap.Sorry, but I've already been disappointed by things of the launch of 5e (though I do like the game itself) - from things that were going to be in the DMG (Kender, anyone?) to this bit of news.  And, in the reddit conversation with Mike Mearls, he mentioned by name a few specific campaign settings that were on the radar, but didn't mention DL.Either WotC is just stringing us along, or they have some great hidden plan for a surprise roll out of Dragonlance.  I will presume the former is what's going on.  They can specifically refer to other settings, but when it comes to DL, it's just "meh, when the time is right."Sorry, but this interview (and others like it), have made me lose all hope in a 5e DL setting coming out. So, for all you FR fans (and I like FR, too, BTW), grats, you get your setting. And it sounds like Dark Sun (one of the worst I've ever experienced) and Eberron (I don't like technology in my fantasy settings) are on the radar, so grats to you, too.DL fans like me get screwed again.  Well, I've bought my 3 rule books for 5e.  No more.  Not another penny to WotC.  I know it won't make a difference to them, but it's important to me to quit supporting a company that doesn't care about a segment of its customer base.</blockquote>

Verification