Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC's Chris Perkins Talks Realms & Sundering
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jeremy E Grenemyer" data-source="post: 7655925" data-attributes="member: 12388"><p>What I was trying to convey was the idea that it is <em>never</em> wise to attach a game designer’s name to a sweeping generalization unless you know for damn sure what you’re saying is true.</p><p></p><p>Otherwise you end up pushing fiction as though it’s truth—even if that wasn’t your intent (which I am sure it wasn’t)—and that fiction propagates until everyone assumes it’s true, and I <strong>know</strong> for a fact this is what vexes and frustrates people like Ed Greenwood, because the person that does the most work relaying answers to questions posed by fans to Ed has said as much.</p><p></p><p>Of course this is true—provided you count all conversations from before the Spellplague existed.</p><p></p><p>If you look only at conversations at Candlekeep from the Spellplague onward, then no it’s not true that the “overwhelming focus” is on the pre-Plague Realms. Have a look at the forums today: plenty of post-Spellgplague talk.</p><p></p><p>Feel free to get cracking on a several years worth study of posts if you disagree. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p>***********</p><p></p><p>I don’t get why people are so dead set on making things into an either/or here. </p><p></p><p>All the work on the Realms from the point WotC realized they screwed up onward has been to flesh out the post-Plague era and weave the pre and post eras together. Regardless of the level of support WotC publishes, what we’re going to see at the start of the 5E Realms is more of this kind of work. </p><p></p><p>If it succeeds, then there’s no point to looking at the current published Realms as a place with little support, because you have everything from word #1 published in a 1979 issue of The Dragon until now to use in your game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jeremy E Grenemyer, post: 7655925, member: 12388"] What I was trying to convey was the idea that it is [i]never[/i] wise to attach a game designer’s name to a sweeping generalization unless you know for damn sure what you’re saying is true. Otherwise you end up pushing fiction as though it’s truth—even if that wasn’t your intent (which I am sure it wasn’t)—and that fiction propagates until everyone assumes it’s true, and I [b]know[/b] for a fact this is what vexes and frustrates people like Ed Greenwood, because the person that does the most work relaying answers to questions posed by fans to Ed has said as much. Of course this is true—provided you count all conversations from before the Spellplague existed. If you look only at conversations at Candlekeep from the Spellplague onward, then no it’s not true that the “overwhelming focus” is on the pre-Plague Realms. Have a look at the forums today: plenty of post-Spellgplague talk. Feel free to get cracking on a several years worth study of posts if you disagree. :p *********** I don’t get why people are so dead set on making things into an either/or here. All the work on the Realms from the point WotC realized they screwed up onward has been to flesh out the post-Plague era and weave the pre and post eras together. Regardless of the level of support WotC publishes, what we’re going to see at the start of the 5E Realms is more of this kind of work. If it succeeds, then there’s no point to looking at the current published Realms as a place with little support, because you have everything from word #1 published in a 1979 issue of The Dragon until now to use in your game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC's Chris Perkins Talks Realms & Sundering
Top