Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC's Jeremy Crawford Talks D&D Alignment Changes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oofta" data-source="post: 8032270" data-attributes="member: 6801845"><p>I admit I am far from perfect. One of the big points of these threads is that people perceive things differently. In addition sarcasm, tone and intent doesn't always come through.</p><p></p><p>So I freely, and repeatedly, admit that sometimes I get a bit oversensitive. I've been lumped in with people that are whiny toddlers, senile old men, racists (there have been posts that were explicit about it) and complainers. It's kind of gotten to me.</p><p></p><p>But I also think that saying a campaign where orcs are evil by nature is racist is extreme. I think that stating having an imaginary creature that could be inherently evil by nature or supernatural means is racist is just a backhanded way of saying anyone who thinks that is racist. Some of the depiction and wording around orcs is, IMHO, a separate issue.</p><p></p><p>So tell you what. I'll stop making the complaint when people stop justifying their opinion by labeling people with differences of opinions in terms of racism, degenerates, senile, toddlers, regressives. Well, actually I'll stop the complaint anyway.</p><p></p><p>But as far as the actual point of the initial article, they're just emphasizing what is already there. Alignment is only as important as you make it. I think that's a good thing. Ignore it, use it as a quick handle for creatures that only appear briefly as part of the story, use it as a strict guideline if you want.</p><p></p><p>There have been posters that think that alignment should be removed completely. We know that in the next adventure the three kobolds in a trench coat will not have an alignment entry at all. If that is the direction they're going and if they are eliminating alignment from the game I personally think it would be a mistake.</p><p></p><p>My preference would be to have more emphasis on alignment being optional, that the alignment associated to a monster being the default emphasized more than a paragraph in the intro of the MM and so on.</p><p></p><p>The issues that D&D face and have always faced are complex. We have moved into a new era of popularity and opinions that are critical of the game (rightfully or not) are often blown up because news feeds thrive on controversy. Something is popular? There has to be something wrong!</p><p></p><p>If you remove everything that could be potentially offensive to someone somewhere there won't be much fluff left to the game. I just hope WOTC finds a happy medium.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oofta, post: 8032270, member: 6801845"] I admit I am far from perfect. One of the big points of these threads is that people perceive things differently. In addition sarcasm, tone and intent doesn't always come through. So I freely, and repeatedly, admit that sometimes I get a bit oversensitive. I've been lumped in with people that are whiny toddlers, senile old men, racists (there have been posts that were explicit about it) and complainers. It's kind of gotten to me. But I also think that saying a campaign where orcs are evil by nature is racist is extreme. I think that stating having an imaginary creature that could be inherently evil by nature or supernatural means is racist is just a backhanded way of saying anyone who thinks that is racist. Some of the depiction and wording around orcs is, IMHO, a separate issue. So tell you what. I'll stop making the complaint when people stop justifying their opinion by labeling people with differences of opinions in terms of racism, degenerates, senile, toddlers, regressives. Well, actually I'll stop the complaint anyway. But as far as the actual point of the initial article, they're just emphasizing what is already there. Alignment is only as important as you make it. I think that's a good thing. Ignore it, use it as a quick handle for creatures that only appear briefly as part of the story, use it as a strict guideline if you want. There have been posters that think that alignment should be removed completely. We know that in the next adventure the three kobolds in a trench coat will not have an alignment entry at all. If that is the direction they're going and if they are eliminating alignment from the game I personally think it would be a mistake. My preference would be to have more emphasis on alignment being optional, that the alignment associated to a monster being the default emphasized more than a paragraph in the intro of the MM and so on. The issues that D&D face and have always faced are complex. We have moved into a new era of popularity and opinions that are critical of the game (rightfully or not) are often blown up because news feeds thrive on controversy. Something is popular? There has to be something wrong! If you remove everything that could be potentially offensive to someone somewhere there won't be much fluff left to the game. I just hope WOTC finds a happy medium. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC's Jeremy Crawford Talks D&D Alignment Changes
Top