Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC's Jeremy Crawford Talks D&D Alignment Changes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheCosmicKid" data-source="post: 8038347" data-attributes="member: 6683613"><p>Well, for starters, you're talking to people whom alignment <em>does</em> help as DMs and players. Are you trying to persuade us that this thing we're using, which seems not to be broken, is? Why?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Okay. Imagine you're, I dunno, a Jacobite. And one day you happen across me, staunch anti-Jacobite that I am, launching into an attack on the supposed contradictions of Jacobitism. And in my attack, I attribute definitions, premises, and concepts to Jacobitism that no actual Jacobite would, not just once or twice, but again and again as my standard mode of argumentation. For you to decide that I did not actually understand Jacobitism would not be an assumption; it would be an <em>observation</em>. And if I were to protest, in spite of all the evidence, that I understood Jacobitism perfectly well -- how are you supposed to respond to that, beyond a simple "I'm sorry, but you clearly don't"?</p><p></p><p></p><p>If chaotic alignments are explicitly stated to be anti-society, you have not quoted that statement. This premise is an invention of yours. The inference that you cannot have a chaotic society: an invention of yours. As you note, chaotic societies <em>abound</em> in D&D. But rather than assuming that your definition of chaotic is correct and therefore this is a contradiction, you ought instead to take this as a sign that perhaps your definition of chaotic is not entirely correct -- that the people who use alignment have a different understanding of that concept than that which you have asserted.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheCosmicKid, post: 8038347, member: 6683613"] Well, for starters, you're talking to people whom alignment [I]does[/I] help as DMs and players. Are you trying to persuade us that this thing we're using, which seems not to be broken, is? Why? Okay. Imagine you're, I dunno, a Jacobite. And one day you happen across me, staunch anti-Jacobite that I am, launching into an attack on the supposed contradictions of Jacobitism. And in my attack, I attribute definitions, premises, and concepts to Jacobitism that no actual Jacobite would, not just once or twice, but again and again as my standard mode of argumentation. For you to decide that I did not actually understand Jacobitism would not be an assumption; it would be an [I]observation[/I]. And if I were to protest, in spite of all the evidence, that I understood Jacobitism perfectly well -- how are you supposed to respond to that, beyond a simple "I'm sorry, but you clearly don't"? If chaotic alignments are explicitly stated to be anti-society, you have not quoted that statement. This premise is an invention of yours. The inference that you cannot have a chaotic society: an invention of yours. As you note, chaotic societies [I]abound[/I] in D&D. But rather than assuming that your definition of chaotic is correct and therefore this is a contradiction, you ought instead to take this as a sign that perhaps your definition of chaotic is not entirely correct -- that the people who use alignment have a different understanding of that concept than that which you have asserted. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC's Jeremy Crawford Talks D&D Alignment Changes
Top