Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC's Jeremy Crawford Talks D&D Alignment Changes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheCosmicKid" data-source="post: 8039119" data-attributes="member: 6683613"><p>You skipped the part asking why you're driving this conversation in circles and whether that's getting you anywhere in order to double down on driving this conversation around in circles. Why did you do that? Is that getting you anywhere?</p><p></p><p>Anyway, there's only one new point I'd like to address; the rest is reassertion, and I'm not interested.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes. That's exactly what we're doing. Reading a one-paragraph description and applying it to a game for dozens or hundreds of sessions is always going to be a process of interpretation. What's going on here is not that we have the canonical truth of the matter and you don't. What's going on here is that we and you have <em>competing interpretations</em>. We read the words one way, you insist they be read another way.</p><p></p><p>You might think at this point that the issue becomes subjective and there's no more to be said. Under other circumstances, that could be true. The problem here is that your interpretations lead to silly contradictions, and our interpretations don't. And that you're trying to convince us to adopt your interpretations. Why on earth would we do that? Why would we throw away something that works for something that doesn't? You seem to be actively trying to make things worse, and you keep dodging the question of <em>why</em>.</p><p></p><p>But anyway: competing interpretations. You go on to wonder if our interpretation has something to do with emperorship versus kingship -- you're speculating about what our interpretation is. But you don't need to speculate. We have been trying to tell you <em>all along</em> how we interpret these concepts. If you want to know, all you have to do is stop rejecting, contradicting, or ignoring what we're telling you. When I explain, <em>e.g.</em>, how despotism can be chaotic if it causes chaos through instability, instead of reasserting your own contradictory interpretation again and again, try just saying, "Huh, that makes more sense, I understand better now how this system works for you, thank you."</p><p></p><p>Or you could keep arguing at people who are very obviously not buying what you're selling.</p><p></p><p>Up to you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheCosmicKid, post: 8039119, member: 6683613"] You skipped the part asking why you're driving this conversation in circles and whether that's getting you anywhere in order to double down on driving this conversation around in circles. Why did you do that? Is that getting you anywhere? Anyway, there's only one new point I'd like to address; the rest is reassertion, and I'm not interested. Yes. That's exactly what we're doing. Reading a one-paragraph description and applying it to a game for dozens or hundreds of sessions is always going to be a process of interpretation. What's going on here is not that we have the canonical truth of the matter and you don't. What's going on here is that we and you have [I]competing interpretations[/I]. We read the words one way, you insist they be read another way. You might think at this point that the issue becomes subjective and there's no more to be said. Under other circumstances, that could be true. The problem here is that your interpretations lead to silly contradictions, and our interpretations don't. And that you're trying to convince us to adopt your interpretations. Why on earth would we do that? Why would we throw away something that works for something that doesn't? You seem to be actively trying to make things worse, and you keep dodging the question of [I]why[/I]. But anyway: competing interpretations. You go on to wonder if our interpretation has something to do with emperorship versus kingship -- you're speculating about what our interpretation is. But you don't need to speculate. We have been trying to tell you [I]all along[/I] how we interpret these concepts. If you want to know, all you have to do is stop rejecting, contradicting, or ignoring what we're telling you. When I explain, [I]e.g.[/I], how despotism can be chaotic if it causes chaos through instability, instead of reasserting your own contradictory interpretation again and again, try just saying, "Huh, that makes more sense, I understand better now how this system works for you, thank you." Or you could keep arguing at people who are very obviously not buying what you're selling. Up to you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC's Jeremy Crawford Talks D&D Alignment Changes
Top