Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC's Jeremy Crawford Talks D&D Alignment Changes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 8049501" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p><em>sigh</em></p><p></p><p>You said that mortal minds could not possibly understand it. </p><p></p><p>Newtonians physics is a bad example, because you literally just laid out a path that people could take to understand it. I go to these people who lack the language and math to understand newtonian physics. I teach them language. I teach the nath. Now they can understand Newtonian physics. Therefore Newtonian physics can be understood by mortal minds. Which should be obvious, since Newton was a mortal mind. </p><p></p><p>I can't even type something that would be incomprehensible to mortal minds. I can't think it. Because I am a mortal mind. I'm taking your claim at face value, that alignment would truly be incomprehensible to mortal minds, and you realize that that means, the DM playing the God doesn't even understand it. He can't, because if he did, then it could be explained to the players, and if it can be explained to the players, it can be explained to their characters. </p><p></p><p>In fact, imagine that scene, but with a part two.</p><p></p><p>The Paladin turns his face to the sky and asks, "Why?" </p><p>the gods answer... "You would not understand if you devoted your life to it for your entire span on Oerth."</p><p></p><p>The player says, "Okay, but DM, why?" </p><p>The DM answers "You would not understand if you devoted your life to it for your entire span on Earth."</p><p></p><p>Because the moment the DM answers why, then alignment is explainable, and that cosmic truth the Paladin couldn't understand is obvious to everyone at the table.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Another really poor example. Let us say you use "Detect Alignment" and detect that someone if Good. Wonderful. How did they get Good? By doing Good deeds? What are those, can "Detect Alignment" show us what a "good deed" is? Is there any spell that can highlight the moment a good deed is done? How can you tell the difference between a Good person doing a good deed, and a good person doing a neutral deed? </p><p></p><p>As far as I'm aware, you can't. Alignment ends up working like a switch. You are Good until you aren't, and that is all that can be observed. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But let me switch this around, because this is getting very far in the weeds. Why do you want an objective Alignment system that no one can understand or express, but definitely exists? </p><p></p><p>Max states that it is because soemone then can be right, even if no one knows it. But, how about you, what value is there is setting this system up where the Gods can't explain it, people can't understand it, but it inevitably true and affects everything.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 8049501, member: 6801228"] [I]sigh[/I] You said that mortal minds could not possibly understand it. Newtonians physics is a bad example, because you literally just laid out a path that people could take to understand it. I go to these people who lack the language and math to understand newtonian physics. I teach them language. I teach the nath. Now they can understand Newtonian physics. Therefore Newtonian physics can be understood by mortal minds. Which should be obvious, since Newton was a mortal mind. I can't even type something that would be incomprehensible to mortal minds. I can't think it. Because I am a mortal mind. I'm taking your claim at face value, that alignment would truly be incomprehensible to mortal minds, and you realize that that means, the DM playing the God doesn't even understand it. He can't, because if he did, then it could be explained to the players, and if it can be explained to the players, it can be explained to their characters. In fact, imagine that scene, but with a part two. The Paladin turns his face to the sky and asks, "Why?" the gods answer... "You would not understand if you devoted your life to it for your entire span on Oerth." The player says, "Okay, but DM, why?" The DM answers "You would not understand if you devoted your life to it for your entire span on Earth." Because the moment the DM answers why, then alignment is explainable, and that cosmic truth the Paladin couldn't understand is obvious to everyone at the table. Another really poor example. Let us say you use "Detect Alignment" and detect that someone if Good. Wonderful. How did they get Good? By doing Good deeds? What are those, can "Detect Alignment" show us what a "good deed" is? Is there any spell that can highlight the moment a good deed is done? How can you tell the difference between a Good person doing a good deed, and a good person doing a neutral deed? As far as I'm aware, you can't. Alignment ends up working like a switch. You are Good until you aren't, and that is all that can be observed. But let me switch this around, because this is getting very far in the weeds. Why do you want an objective Alignment system that no one can understand or express, but definitely exists? Max states that it is because soemone then can be right, even if no one knows it. But, how about you, what value is there is setting this system up where the Gods can't explain it, people can't understand it, but it inevitably true and affects everything. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC's Jeremy Crawford Talks D&D Alignment Changes
Top