Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Would 4E be Popular?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Sophist" data-source="post: 1963756" data-attributes="member: 25390"><p>A lot of crap has been spewed in this thread, but I think Rasyr places his finger on a major vein here...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree with this. Hasbro definitely know where the profits are -- they're with <em>minis </em> (you Suckas! anyone over the age of 20 should feel shame ... <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /> ).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I can see why there might be a motivation to make it a closed system, but I doubt this very much. The reason is simple: with the OGL, the genie is out of the bottle. </p><p></p><p>If 'Has bored-of-the-Coast' decided to make a closed system, they would immediately splinter the market between the OGL faction and the new non-OGL faction.</p><p></p><p>Mongoose (with their 'pocket' versions of the PHB & DMG) would instantly leap into the gap, and produce hardback version of the "old" OGL rules.</p><p></p><p>The market would be split. </p><p></p><p>Okay, this is NOT an impossibility. If Hasbro decided that the profits gained from a smaller slice of the RPG market PLUS the profits from their 'action figures' (whoops, I mean 'plastic minis') outweighed the profits gained from being the main system of RPGers, then they might make 4e a 'closed system'.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yup. Branding rules.</p><p></p><p>But only so far ...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In other worlds, normal laws of human behaviour will apply. How shocking! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /> </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Yes ... branding ... painfully TRUE. But not a guarantee ... (how many people still buy Commodore computers?) ...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Whining will happen, but if it is similar to 3.x and OGL the whining will be less than it will be if WotC cuts off the OGL teat.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think this is the one overwhelmingly correct insight of your post, Rasyr. Hasbro know where the money is. 3.5 was FAR MORE 'miniatures-dependent' than 3.0 (and 3.0 was already pretty dependent on minis). </p><p> </p><p>But maybe the ultimate oldschoolers will be happy -- a final return to "Chainmail-plus-fantasy supplement!" </p><p> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Sophist, post: 1963756, member: 25390"] A lot of crap has been spewed in this thread, but I think Rasyr places his finger on a major vein here... I agree with this. Hasbro definitely know where the profits are -- they're with [I]minis [/I] (you Suckas! anyone over the age of 20 should feel shame ... :lol: ). I can see why there might be a motivation to make it a closed system, but I doubt this very much. The reason is simple: with the OGL, the genie is out of the bottle. If 'Has bored-of-the-Coast' decided to make a closed system, they would immediately splinter the market between the OGL faction and the new non-OGL faction. Mongoose (with their 'pocket' versions of the PHB & DMG) would instantly leap into the gap, and produce hardback version of the "old" OGL rules. The market would be split. Okay, this is NOT an impossibility. If Hasbro decided that the profits gained from a smaller slice of the RPG market PLUS the profits from their 'action figures' (whoops, I mean 'plastic minis') outweighed the profits gained from being the main system of RPGers, then they might make 4e a 'closed system'. Yup. Branding rules. But only so far ... In other worlds, normal laws of human behaviour will apply. How shocking! :confused: Yes ... branding ... painfully TRUE. But not a guarantee ... (how many people still buy Commodore computers?) ... Whining will happen, but if it is similar to 3.x and OGL the whining will be less than it will be if WotC cuts off the OGL teat. I think this is the one overwhelmingly correct insight of your post, Rasyr. Hasbro know where the money is. 3.5 was FAR MORE 'miniatures-dependent' than 3.0 (and 3.0 was already pretty dependent on minis). But maybe the ultimate oldschoolers will be happy -- a final return to "Chainmail-plus-fantasy supplement!" :confused: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Would 4E be Popular?
Top