Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Would a OneDND closed/restricted license be good, actually?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 8875418" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>I'm saying that if you <em>really</em> want "WotC's overbearing influence" (as you put it) to stop being on top of the hobby... then you have to be a part of that stop. And the only way that happens is if people stop giving their time and energy towards WotC and 5E and spend their time on the games they actually like.</p><p></p><p>For instance, I don't give a rat's ass about Pathfinder. Good or bad. So I have never once posted in the Pathfinder subforum and probably have only glanced at it a few times over the last dozen years. And I'm even playing in a PF game right now! But by me not spending any of my time or energy adding to that subforum by posting in it... the forum is just ever-so-slightly smaller. Which means other people who might come here and take a look see a forum just ever-so-slightly less active, and thus perhaps they decide not to get involve either (or simply get involved less, because there's less "going on" there.) And if you take my decision and you multiply it by <em>all the other</em> people who also don't care about Pathfinder... eventually the board gets smaller and smaller with nothing of interest to talk about and less new people come looking for it because it's become smaller and smaller. And eventually the Pathfinder board loses influence, cache, and maybe even dies out down the line. And when you take that lack of interest in the subforum and you translate it over to <em>the game</em>, the game then becomes smaller and smaller as well, with less influence or cache. Which is exactly what we have right now... a Pathfinder (and especially a Pathfinder 2) which does not in any way hold any sway in the gaming marketplace like they used to when they were poised up against 4E and were dominant.</p><p></p><p>And some of the folks here want 5E to follow suit? Then you gotta follow the same playbook.</p><p></p><p>Isn't the old cliche "There is no bad press"? And that's exactly what is happening here. By constantly talking about D&D 5E (even negatively) you are keeping these boards alive and keeping interactions on the game alive and keeping engagement with the game alive. And thus you are doing the exact opposite of what you need to be doing to lessen WotC's overbearing influence. 5E can't go away if you won't let it leave. And this is true for everyone-- if you truly want the game to reduce its influence and die out... you have to take that first step by being one of the people to just walk away from it and not engage. Only then will other people begin to follow suit... and then ever-so-slowly WotC's influence over the hobby might slowly degrade.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 8875418, member: 7006"] I'm saying that if you [I]really[/I] want "WotC's overbearing influence" (as you put it) to stop being on top of the hobby... then you have to be a part of that stop. And the only way that happens is if people stop giving their time and energy towards WotC and 5E and spend their time on the games they actually like. For instance, I don't give a rat's ass about Pathfinder. Good or bad. So I have never once posted in the Pathfinder subforum and probably have only glanced at it a few times over the last dozen years. And I'm even playing in a PF game right now! But by me not spending any of my time or energy adding to that subforum by posting in it... the forum is just ever-so-slightly smaller. Which means other people who might come here and take a look see a forum just ever-so-slightly less active, and thus perhaps they decide not to get involve either (or simply get involved less, because there's less "going on" there.) And if you take my decision and you multiply it by [I]all the other[/I] people who also don't care about Pathfinder... eventually the board gets smaller and smaller with nothing of interest to talk about and less new people come looking for it because it's become smaller and smaller. And eventually the Pathfinder board loses influence, cache, and maybe even dies out down the line. And when you take that lack of interest in the subforum and you translate it over to [I]the game[/I], the game then becomes smaller and smaller as well, with less influence or cache. Which is exactly what we have right now... a Pathfinder (and especially a Pathfinder 2) which does not in any way hold any sway in the gaming marketplace like they used to when they were poised up against 4E and were dominant. And some of the folks here want 5E to follow suit? Then you gotta follow the same playbook. Isn't the old cliche "There is no bad press"? And that's exactly what is happening here. By constantly talking about D&D 5E (even negatively) you are keeping these boards alive and keeping interactions on the game alive and keeping engagement with the game alive. And thus you are doing the exact opposite of what you need to be doing to lessen WotC's overbearing influence. 5E can't go away if you won't let it leave. And this is true for everyone-- if you truly want the game to reduce its influence and die out... you have to take that first step by being one of the people to just walk away from it and not engage. Only then will other people begin to follow suit... and then ever-so-slowly WotC's influence over the hobby might slowly degrade. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Would a OneDND closed/restricted license be good, actually?
Top