Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
would a paladin hate a cleric of wee jas? vice-versa?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lord Pendragon" data-source="post: 2550142" data-attributes="member: 707"><p>This is entirely dependent on how your DM views Wee Jas's alignment, Her clerics' alignments, and channeling negative energy. It's already been cited that, RAW, channeling negative energy is an [Evil] act. I tend to use this as-written, since it explains why even mindless undead ping on the Pala-dar (paladin radar <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />).</p><p></p><p>As a DM, I tend to liken channeling negative energy as [Evil] in the same way that slapping a puppy is [Evil]. Which is to say it definitely <em>is</em> [Evil]...but in a very minor way, in the grand scheme of things.</p><p></p><p>Therefore, so long as a Lawful-Neutral cleric of Wee Jas does [Good] things as well (as the cleric is bound to do, adventuring with a paladin,) the cleric will be in no danger of falling into Lawful-Evil.</p><p></p><p>Now then, let's look at the RAW restrictions placed on a paladin with regards to whom he associates with:We're clear on the first part--the cleric wouldn't be an evil character. However, the second part may get us in trouble. Though a cleric of Wee Jas can remain Lawful-Neutral, I'd definitely rule channeling Negative energy as something that would offend a paladin's moral code. So a cleric of Wee Jas that consistantly channeled Negative energy would indeed create a problem. Either the paladin or the cleric would have to leave the party eventually.</p><p></p><p>The only way to avoid this, as I see it, would be for the cleric of Wee Jas to avoid channeling Negative energy. Or if the DM truly wanted to see this combination succeed, he might give the cleric a bonus feat:</p><p></p><p>POSITIVE AFFINITY [Divine]</p><p>Prerequisites: Ability to channel Negative energy.</p><p>Benefit: By spending an extra Turning attempt, you can channel Positive energy instead of Negative energy.</p><p>Normal: A cleric can only channel one kind of energy, Positive or Negative.I would not prohibit it, but neither would I ignore the inherent problems with the situation. To do so cheapens what it means to be a paladin, IMO. But taking the above steps, I do think the combination is possible.No. If the cleric does this on a regular basis, the paladin's moral code will be offended.Absolutely, but this is entirely an RP issue.I don't think so. The fact that there are evil clerics of Wee Jas is the sticking point for me. I don't think a paladin could serve a god that sanctioned evil followers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lord Pendragon, post: 2550142, member: 707"] This is entirely dependent on how your DM views Wee Jas's alignment, Her clerics' alignments, and channeling negative energy. It's already been cited that, RAW, channeling negative energy is an [Evil] act. I tend to use this as-written, since it explains why even mindless undead ping on the Pala-dar (paladin radar :p). As a DM, I tend to liken channeling negative energy as [Evil] in the same way that slapping a puppy is [Evil]. Which is to say it definitely [i]is[/i] [Evil]...but in a very minor way, in the grand scheme of things. Therefore, so long as a Lawful-Neutral cleric of Wee Jas does [Good] things as well (as the cleric is bound to do, adventuring with a paladin,) the cleric will be in no danger of falling into Lawful-Evil. Now then, let's look at the RAW restrictions placed on a paladin with regards to whom he associates with:We're clear on the first part--the cleric wouldn't be an evil character. However, the second part may get us in trouble. Though a cleric of Wee Jas can remain Lawful-Neutral, I'd definitely rule channeling Negative energy as something that would offend a paladin's moral code. So a cleric of Wee Jas that consistantly channeled Negative energy would indeed create a problem. Either the paladin or the cleric would have to leave the party eventually. The only way to avoid this, as I see it, would be for the cleric of Wee Jas to avoid channeling Negative energy. Or if the DM truly wanted to see this combination succeed, he might give the cleric a bonus feat: POSITIVE AFFINITY [Divine] Prerequisites: Ability to channel Negative energy. Benefit: By spending an extra Turning attempt, you can channel Positive energy instead of Negative energy. Normal: A cleric can only channel one kind of energy, Positive or Negative.I would not prohibit it, but neither would I ignore the inherent problems with the situation. To do so cheapens what it means to be a paladin, IMO. But taking the above steps, I do think the combination is possible.No. If the cleric does this on a regular basis, the paladin's moral code will be offended.Absolutely, but this is entirely an RP issue.I don't think so. The fact that there are evil clerics of Wee Jas is the sticking point for me. I don't think a paladin could serve a god that sanctioned evil followers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
would a paladin hate a cleric of wee jas? vice-versa?
Top