Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Would a repeat of the large errata from the previous edition put you off of Next?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jan van Leyden" data-source="post: 6283250" data-attributes="member: 20307"><p>Wow! That's some thread... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>I assume customers will see a lot of errata for 5e as well, and not for typos only. The reason is simple: the game will be extended by additional rules modules each of which - in the best of all worlds - can be used in any single game. This opens up dozens of variations. Now could the desginers foresee a rules module which will be published in four years? I don't think so.</p><p></p><p>So they either limit themselves when designing the new module that it falls completely within the border defined by the core rules or they try something new and risk producing incongruencies, which make rules changing errata necessary.</p><p></p><p>Playtesting such an addition to hammer out each and every problem is next to impossible: the number of possible variations of the modules prohibits it.</p><p></p><p>And if you want 5e to have a long run, maybe even be an evergreen version, it becomes more pronounced. Many gamers will start craving for some "interesting" addition, so you will have to get more experimental. While the "Manual of Halfling Gardening" might be quite safe to design, the sales will probably not suffice.</p><p></p><p>Another question ist the errata threshold: do you fix/change each and every little thing (typos, I'm looking at you)? If not, how do you decide what to fix? Do you appoint a bug manager who does nothing but evaluate bug report and applications for changes? Bug fixing by committee?</p><p></p><p>The 4e "solution" with the CB and the online compendium was conceptually cool. Each single item could be changed and auto-feeded to the gamers (with DDI, though). If they would have added the possiblitiy compare different versions of the texts, maybe even "save" the version for me that I like best, I would have been a happy camper.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jan van Leyden, post: 6283250, member: 20307"] Wow! That's some thread... :) I assume customers will see a lot of errata for 5e as well, and not for typos only. The reason is simple: the game will be extended by additional rules modules each of which - in the best of all worlds - can be used in any single game. This opens up dozens of variations. Now could the desginers foresee a rules module which will be published in four years? I don't think so. So they either limit themselves when designing the new module that it falls completely within the border defined by the core rules or they try something new and risk producing incongruencies, which make rules changing errata necessary. Playtesting such an addition to hammer out each and every problem is next to impossible: the number of possible variations of the modules prohibits it. And if you want 5e to have a long run, maybe even be an evergreen version, it becomes more pronounced. Many gamers will start craving for some "interesting" addition, so you will have to get more experimental. While the "Manual of Halfling Gardening" might be quite safe to design, the sales will probably not suffice. Another question ist the errata threshold: do you fix/change each and every little thing (typos, I'm looking at you)? If not, how do you decide what to fix? Do you appoint a bug manager who does nothing but evaluate bug report and applications for changes? Bug fixing by committee? The 4e "solution" with the CB and the online compendium was conceptually cool. Each single item could be changed and auto-feeded to the gamers (with DDI, though). If they would have added the possiblitiy compare different versions of the texts, maybe even "save" the version for me that I like best, I would have been a happy camper. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Would a repeat of the large errata from the previous edition put you off of Next?
Top