Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Would Allowing Multiple Reactions Break The Game?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NotAYakk" data-source="post: 8285578" data-attributes="member: 72555"><p>Philosophically, more tiny reactions is a gameplay problem.</p><p></p><p>If you have a pile of small impact things you can do off turn, the game bogs down. The narrative impact of each small thing is small, they may add up to only a medium impact; but evaluating a small thing <strong>takes the same time</strong> as a larger thing.</p><p></p><p>The multiple attacks on your turn <strong>tend</strong> to be focused on one foe, so don't have as much impact. People roll them all at once.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>Rather than give people a pile of reactions, maybe make reactions more beefy. And maybe give people a chance to not lose your reaction, so you can't say "distract him, then flood past".</p><p></p><p><strong>Threaten</strong></p><p>When you make a melee attack on a foe on your turn, you threaten them. If you fail a saving throw or are hit before the start of your next turn, your threat goes away. If you start your turn threatening a foe, your attacks on that creature are at advantage, and the first hit is automatically a critical hit.</p><p></p><p><strong>Opportunity Attack</strong></p><p>When a creature tries to get past you by leaving your reach or moving through your space, you can expend a reaction to make a melee weapon attack. If the attack hits, you <strong>Threaten</strong> the creature. If your attack roll is even, you regain your reaction.</p><p></p><p>This does 2 things.</p><p></p><p>1. Threaten is an anti-focus-fire feature. Creatures you don't attack get threat, which they turn into punishment. So you are encouraged to attack creatures who are hitting you instead of focusing on bringing one foe down.</p><p></p><p>Similarly, monsters are encouraged to spread their attacks around instead of focusing on dropping one player.</p><p></p><p>Mooks can offer cover for the big bad; a rogue threatening the big bad can have that threat cleared by a mook. But you have to <strong>hit</strong> or make them fail a save to block the threat.</p><p></p><p>2. Opportunity attack makes ignoring the front line worse.</p><p></p><p>First, you have a 50% chance to get a 2nd OA, etc. Second, it is a way to apply <strong>Threat</strong> off turn. Off-turn <strong>Threat</strong> is much stronger; there is less time for someone to clear it.</p><p></p><p>So if you run past the front line, you get to hit. Then if they keep going, you can follow and clean up with auto-advantage auto-crit, unless you are kept busy by their allies.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>I am worried it is too expensive however.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NotAYakk, post: 8285578, member: 72555"] Philosophically, more tiny reactions is a gameplay problem. If you have a pile of small impact things you can do off turn, the game bogs down. The narrative impact of each small thing is small, they may add up to only a medium impact; but evaluating a small thing [b]takes the same time[/b] as a larger thing. The multiple attacks on your turn [b]tend[/b] to be focused on one foe, so don't have as much impact. People roll them all at once. --- Rather than give people a pile of reactions, maybe make reactions more beefy. And maybe give people a chance to not lose your reaction, so you can't say "distract him, then flood past". [b]Threaten[/b] When you make a melee attack on a foe on your turn, you threaten them. If you fail a saving throw or are hit before the start of your next turn, your threat goes away. If you start your turn threatening a foe, your attacks on that creature are at advantage, and the first hit is automatically a critical hit. [b]Opportunity Attack[/b] When a creature tries to get past you by leaving your reach or moving through your space, you can expend a reaction to make a melee weapon attack. If the attack hits, you [b]Threaten[/b] the creature. If your attack roll is even, you regain your reaction. This does 2 things. 1. Threaten is an anti-focus-fire feature. Creatures you don't attack get threat, which they turn into punishment. So you are encouraged to attack creatures who are hitting you instead of focusing on bringing one foe down. Similarly, monsters are encouraged to spread their attacks around instead of focusing on dropping one player. Mooks can offer cover for the big bad; a rogue threatening the big bad can have that threat cleared by a mook. But you have to [b]hit[/b] or make them fail a save to block the threat. 2. Opportunity attack makes ignoring the front line worse. First, you have a 50% chance to get a 2nd OA, etc. Second, it is a way to apply [b]Threat[/b] off turn. Off-turn [b]Threat[/b] is much stronger; there is less time for someone to clear it. So if you run past the front line, you get to hit. Then if they keep going, you can follow and clean up with auto-advantage auto-crit, unless you are kept busy by their allies. --- I am worried it is too expensive however. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Would Allowing Multiple Reactions Break The Game?
Top