Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Would Paizo Make a Better Steward for Our Hobby?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gundark" data-source="post: 6217706" data-attributes="member: 6148"><p>In fairness this response is better than your first one. </p><p></p><p>Paizo does market their brand of 3.5 well to their intended audience. Thus people who are in that audience are more inclined to say "yes" to the answer posed by the OP because currently Paizo speaks to what they like. </p><p></p><p>Could Paizo market well to those who are not in their intended audience? This is the real question the OP is asking. I'm skeptical on this. Admittedly I’m currently not in Paizo’s target audience so I may be more inclined to be skeptical than a fan of their product. Again they do what they do very well, and I have been constantly amazed at what they have accomplished with that one thing. </p><p>I suspect fiancés play into this. I’m sure that if they had the resources to do so they would have supported both PF and 4e. They had to choose and they chose the more logical option. They also may have tried to support a “PF lite” but most likely were only able to produce the beginner box with the hopes of hooking more people in. Despite being what I hear was a superb product they seem unwilling (for whatever reason) to support this with further products.</p><p>However to be the “steward” of D&D they would have to broaden their range and provide products to other play styles. I’m not a Paizo customer because I really despise 3e, and there is a good chunk of people like me (fans of other editions including 4e). How well could they walk this line between reeling people like me in and keeping the fans they have is unknown. It is a real risk to miss-step too far one side or the other, to cut unprofitable lines in favour for another, to be innovative with their products and to attempt to market D&D beyond their current fan base and to bring new customers in. Mistakes will be made, and they could end up shooting themselves in the foot like WotC has at times. People change positions, new Brand managers come and go, and somewhere along the line someone markets something foolishly. Paizo isn’t immune to this.</p><p>The interesting time for Paizo will be the years to come when sales of books begin to lag and bloat steps in more, when their Adventure paths begin to feel “samey”. I’ll be curious to see how well they navigate this and what they do. </p><p>Long story short, yes they do what they do well with what they have. Could they do it across the D&D fanbase? Colour me Skeptical.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gundark, post: 6217706, member: 6148"] In fairness this response is better than your first one. Paizo does market their brand of 3.5 well to their intended audience. Thus people who are in that audience are more inclined to say "yes" to the answer posed by the OP because currently Paizo speaks to what they like. Could Paizo market well to those who are not in their intended audience? This is the real question the OP is asking. I'm skeptical on this. Admittedly I’m currently not in Paizo’s target audience so I may be more inclined to be skeptical than a fan of their product. Again they do what they do very well, and I have been constantly amazed at what they have accomplished with that one thing. I suspect fiancés play into this. I’m sure that if they had the resources to do so they would have supported both PF and 4e. They had to choose and they chose the more logical option. They also may have tried to support a “PF lite” but most likely were only able to produce the beginner box with the hopes of hooking more people in. Despite being what I hear was a superb product they seem unwilling (for whatever reason) to support this with further products. However to be the “steward” of D&D they would have to broaden their range and provide products to other play styles. I’m not a Paizo customer because I really despise 3e, and there is a good chunk of people like me (fans of other editions including 4e). How well could they walk this line between reeling people like me in and keeping the fans they have is unknown. It is a real risk to miss-step too far one side or the other, to cut unprofitable lines in favour for another, to be innovative with their products and to attempt to market D&D beyond their current fan base and to bring new customers in. Mistakes will be made, and they could end up shooting themselves in the foot like WotC has at times. People change positions, new Brand managers come and go, and somewhere along the line someone markets something foolishly. Paizo isn’t immune to this. The interesting time for Paizo will be the years to come when sales of books begin to lag and bloat steps in more, when their Adventure paths begin to feel “samey”. I’ll be curious to see how well they navigate this and what they do. Long story short, yes they do what they do well with what they have. Could they do it across the D&D fanbase? Colour me Skeptical. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Would Paizo Make a Better Steward for Our Hobby?
Top