Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Would Paizo Make a Better Steward for Our Hobby?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Majoru Oakheart" data-source="post: 6218534" data-attributes="member: 5143"><p>No, disliking 4e doesn't make someone an antigamer. There were people who hated D&D all along. They played other games.</p><p></p><p>My problem wasn't that Paizo published a game. It's that they published 3.5e D&D...again. And they published it based on a knee jerk reaction to 4e and an aversion to change. Aversion to change is a really common human trait. It rarely does us any good. However, it's really easy to predict that given the choice to change or stay the same most people will stay the same unless there is a REALLY good reason to change.</p><p></p><p>So, when 4e came out...the easiest thing for people to do was to stick with what they knew: 3.5e. But there was a really good reason to switch: No more 3.5e books and the majority of their friends hopping on the 4e bandwagon. Paizo gave everyone an easy out by making it easy to avoid change: Play their game that was almost identical to 3.5e D&D.</p><p></p><p>Sure, it was a great strategy for making money. But it made the community fall apart. It caused the edition wars to be louder and more angry than they ever would have been without it.</p><p></p><p>A number of my friends were RIGHT on the edge of playing 4e with us, they had huge doubts about the game because of how different it was but they were willing to give it a try until they heard about Pathfinder. Then almost all of them decided that it was better to stick with a game system that was more like what they were used to. A game system that promised it was completely compatible with 3.5e so they didn't even have to buy new books, they could just play characters directly out of the 3.5e PHB(this was later changed, but it was one of the first advertised traits of Pathfinder). Most of them didn't even try 4e because of that. They had just "heard bad things" and therefore wouldn't even keep an open mind. I don't even see half of them anymore because most of the time we spent together was gaming and we no longer play the same games.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Majoru Oakheart, post: 6218534, member: 5143"] No, disliking 4e doesn't make someone an antigamer. There were people who hated D&D all along. They played other games. My problem wasn't that Paizo published a game. It's that they published 3.5e D&D...again. And they published it based on a knee jerk reaction to 4e and an aversion to change. Aversion to change is a really common human trait. It rarely does us any good. However, it's really easy to predict that given the choice to change or stay the same most people will stay the same unless there is a REALLY good reason to change. So, when 4e came out...the easiest thing for people to do was to stick with what they knew: 3.5e. But there was a really good reason to switch: No more 3.5e books and the majority of their friends hopping on the 4e bandwagon. Paizo gave everyone an easy out by making it easy to avoid change: Play their game that was almost identical to 3.5e D&D. Sure, it was a great strategy for making money. But it made the community fall apart. It caused the edition wars to be louder and more angry than they ever would have been without it. A number of my friends were RIGHT on the edge of playing 4e with us, they had huge doubts about the game because of how different it was but they were willing to give it a try until they heard about Pathfinder. Then almost all of them decided that it was better to stick with a game system that was more like what they were used to. A game system that promised it was completely compatible with 3.5e so they didn't even have to buy new books, they could just play characters directly out of the 3.5e PHB(this was later changed, but it was one of the first advertised traits of Pathfinder). Most of them didn't even try 4e because of that. They had just "heard bad things" and therefore wouldn't even keep an open mind. I don't even see half of them anymore because most of the time we spent together was gaming and we no longer play the same games. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Would Paizo Make a Better Steward for Our Hobby?
Top