Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Would Paizo Make a Better Steward for Our Hobby?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GreyLord" data-source="post: 6218692" data-attributes="member: 4348"><p>And THIS is the true bitter pill for 3e/3.5 players. They created the doomsday machine. </p><p></p><p>When 3e came out, the brilliant plan was to kill off AD&D and D&D and replace it with D20. How to do this...simple...don't print anymore material for the older editions. Make it so that hardcopy is extinct.</p><p></p><p>Basically, if players want to play D&D, they HAVE to switch to the new edition. It was said, it was done, so it was history.</p><p></p><p>It was highly successful. There was NO reason, or so WotC thought, that they could not replicate this exact feat once again. They basically did the same thing to 3.5 as they did to 2e/D&D/AD&D. Exact same playbook, exact same plays. If you look at the early marketing campaigns for 3e, it's remarkable how closely they mirror 4e's marketing.</p><p></p><p>If you call 4e's marketing arrogant, 3e's was just as arrogant.</p><p></p><p>There was one difference though, and you can blame Ryan Dancey for that. The seeds of what occurred with 4e started all the way back prior to 3e's release, and that was when the idea of an OGL was created.</p><p></p><p>What 4e's release had to contend with that 3e did not, was an OGL. That's what made PF possible, that's what made other systems possible, and that's why what worked for 3e's release did NOT work for 4e's release.</p><p></p><p>IF T$R had release and OGL in regards to AD&D, it's actually quite possible you'd have seen a similar scenario happen with 3e's release.</p><p></p><p>I point this out to say, I can actually see the idea where if PF was not created, 4e may have been FAR more successful. I won't say it would have been, but at the same time, I'd say there's precedence for it.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I'm wildly glad at this point for the OGL and Dancey's idea. Why? Because I absolutely love PF and what Paizo has done.</p><p></p><p>But, the problem with many people is while they complain about how 4e came out, they are blind to their own actions and how 3e was put out, and how that was the pattern that was created for 4e's release as well.</p><p></p><p>It's basically a...you reap what you sow...type scenario...both for the Players of D&D/PF and for WotC.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GreyLord, post: 6218692, member: 4348"] And THIS is the true bitter pill for 3e/3.5 players. They created the doomsday machine. When 3e came out, the brilliant plan was to kill off AD&D and D&D and replace it with D20. How to do this...simple...don't print anymore material for the older editions. Make it so that hardcopy is extinct. Basically, if players want to play D&D, they HAVE to switch to the new edition. It was said, it was done, so it was history. It was highly successful. There was NO reason, or so WotC thought, that they could not replicate this exact feat once again. They basically did the same thing to 3.5 as they did to 2e/D&D/AD&D. Exact same playbook, exact same plays. If you look at the early marketing campaigns for 3e, it's remarkable how closely they mirror 4e's marketing. If you call 4e's marketing arrogant, 3e's was just as arrogant. There was one difference though, and you can blame Ryan Dancey for that. The seeds of what occurred with 4e started all the way back prior to 3e's release, and that was when the idea of an OGL was created. What 4e's release had to contend with that 3e did not, was an OGL. That's what made PF possible, that's what made other systems possible, and that's why what worked for 3e's release did NOT work for 4e's release. IF T$R had release and OGL in regards to AD&D, it's actually quite possible you'd have seen a similar scenario happen with 3e's release. I point this out to say, I can actually see the idea where if PF was not created, 4e may have been FAR more successful. I won't say it would have been, but at the same time, I'd say there's precedence for it. Personally, I'm wildly glad at this point for the OGL and Dancey's idea. Why? Because I absolutely love PF and what Paizo has done. But, the problem with many people is while they complain about how 4e came out, they are blind to their own actions and how 3e was put out, and how that was the pattern that was created for 4e's release as well. It's basically a...you reap what you sow...type scenario...both for the Players of D&D/PF and for WotC. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Would Paizo Make a Better Steward for Our Hobby?
Top