Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="gamerprinter" data-source="post: 6218900" data-attributes="member: 50895">No, I made no such claim. Everything I'm saying is in regards to stewardship by a single company. If you got that I'm saying only a single game system for all RPGs, you are not getting my meaning. I am only referring to game systems owned by game publishers. You've completely misunderstood my posts.I didn't realize you were asking me that. But I see OGL is great for the hobby in itself, what it caused during d20 glut was how many publishers treated it wasn't necessarily good, but it was the actions by these publishers that wasn't good, not the license itself. Now the days long after the d20 bubble burst, OGL is still around and through other systems like Pathfinder it's proving it's worth. The publishers today are using OGL like it should have always been used.But the OGL is a side issue, in that it doesn't resolve the question (nor really have anything to do with) of who should be steward of the hobby? All my posts in this thread, except for this last post regarding the OGL, refer only to stewardship - so let's return to the question at hand, and drop the OGL red herring.</blockquote>