Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Would this be as inappropriate as I think?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andre" data-source="post: 2473160" data-attributes="member: 25930"><p>Again, why? Just to be clear, I'm looking at this as a non-publisher, so some things that may seem obvious to you are not to me. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Two points here. Obviously, trying to damage another's product is off-limits. So is misrepresenting one's own product as the publisher's. For instance, how many times have we seen a box that looks *almost* identical to Tide or Windex at the dollar stores? Those products are clearly trying to defraud the consumer. </p><p></p><p>But, if a publisher refuses for whatever reason to allow use of its trademark by another publisher, does that mean the other publisher has no recourse to any action which the first publisher dislikes? Does the first publisher get a veto over the product name? Does it get rights to edit the product? Just to be "friendly"? Again, just because someone is first in using a particular naming convention, does that give them ownership - no matter what?</p><p></p><p>Second, while I feel it's correct to communicate with a publisher when seeking to publish their OGC, what if the publisher refuses? Legally, they don't have that right, but many publishers try to do this. If the second publisher goes ahead and uses (legally) the OGC material, who's being "unfriendly" and "unethical" - the first publisher, the second, or both?</p><p></p><p>It just strikes me that this is not a black and white issue. A publisher can act in a manner that seems ethical and considerate to him, which another publisher takes serious exception to. There can be a large number of mitigating factors involved, and asking the entire community (including gamers) to frown on this specific behavior is too broad, IMO. In the end, I'd have to judge a publisher's actions in total - not just this isolated action, especially if I don't have all the facts (and I won't).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andre, post: 2473160, member: 25930"] Again, why? Just to be clear, I'm looking at this as a non-publisher, so some things that may seem obvious to you are not to me. Two points here. Obviously, trying to damage another's product is off-limits. So is misrepresenting one's own product as the publisher's. For instance, how many times have we seen a box that looks *almost* identical to Tide or Windex at the dollar stores? Those products are clearly trying to defraud the consumer. But, if a publisher refuses for whatever reason to allow use of its trademark by another publisher, does that mean the other publisher has no recourse to any action which the first publisher dislikes? Does the first publisher get a veto over the product name? Does it get rights to edit the product? Just to be "friendly"? Again, just because someone is first in using a particular naming convention, does that give them ownership - no matter what? Second, while I feel it's correct to communicate with a publisher when seeking to publish their OGC, what if the publisher refuses? Legally, they don't have that right, but many publishers try to do this. If the second publisher goes ahead and uses (legally) the OGC material, who's being "unfriendly" and "unethical" - the first publisher, the second, or both? It just strikes me that this is not a black and white issue. A publisher can act in a manner that seems ethical and considerate to him, which another publisher takes serious exception to. There can be a large number of mitigating factors involved, and asking the entire community (including gamers) to frown on this specific behavior is too broad, IMO. In the end, I'd have to judge a publisher's actions in total - not just this isolated action, especially if I don't have all the facts (and I won't). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Would this be as inappropriate as I think?
Top