Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="scourger" data-source="post: 2474054" data-attributes="member: 12328">Phil, I think ____Craft titles are fine.&nbsp; There are so many such titles that I don't think you'll be infringing on SpyCraft (2.0 or otherwise).&nbsp; The trade dress is more important than the words for product recognition.&nbsp; I still get confused when I see Hunter books because I often think they are Deadlands products.&nbsp; Since you mainly publish pdfs, it shouldn't be as much of an issue if your electronic trade dress is similar to that of SpyCraft since the products won't be on shelves for comparison and confusion.&nbsp; The other about being for use with the 2.0 espionage rules is more problematic.&nbsp; I wouldn't do it if I were you without either permission or lack of concern.&nbsp; Since you are concerned, check with them first.&nbsp; I might like to see some adventures for SpyCraft, but it has to be done right to get my attention.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="scourger, post: 2474054, member: 12328"] Phil, I think ____Craft titles are fine. There are so many such titles that I don't think you'll be infringing on SpyCraft (2.0 or otherwise). The trade dress is more important than the words for product recognition. I still get confused when I see [I]Hunter[/I] books because I often think they are [I]Deadlands[/I] products. Since you mainly publish pdfs, it shouldn't be as much of an issue if your electronic trade dress is similar to that of SpyCraft since the products won't be on shelves for comparison and confusion. The other about being for use with the 2.0 espionage rules is more problematic. I wouldn't do it if I were you without either permission or lack of concern. Since you are concerned, check with them first. I might like to see some adventures for SpyCraft, but it has to be done right to get my attention. [/QUOTE]

Verification