Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tsyr" data-source="post: 453503" data-attributes="member: 354">Re: To darned many Re:'sWell, given you gave me NO indication which of my posts you were replying to, this is a shot in the dark, but... assuming you were refering to the one where I quoted a brief snipped of the original post a couple posts up...I am not &quot;making many assumptions&quot;. What I am assuming , though, (And I won't deny this) is that since this topic was one the poster sought out an answer to, he would have mentioned something as important as, say, the politician being evil, or that the party had an earth-shaking goal that they were being prevented from, (As someone earlier suggested, don't remember if that was you), etc etc. I can only discuss meaningfully what has been posted... it's sorta silly, IMO, to invent a number of possible situations that could have been, when we have been given no indication any of them were the case. That would be like... oh... if someone asked you to pick up milk at the store for them, you picking up eggs instead because they might have misspoke.But one thing I am not doing, despite your accusations, is using these as a base of proof. I'm simply not going to give them the benefit of the unlikely doubt in this case unless I have shred of reason to do so.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tsyr, post: 453503, member: 354"] [b]Re: To darned many Re:'s[/b] Well, given you gave me NO indication which of my posts you were replying to, this is a shot in the dark, but... assuming you were refering to the one where I quoted a brief snipped of the original post a couple posts up... I am not "making many assumptions". What I am [I]assuming[/I] , though, (And I won't deny this) is that since this topic was one the poster sought out an answer to, he would have mentioned something as important as, say, the politician being evil, or that the party had an earth-shaking goal that they were being prevented from, (As someone earlier suggested, don't remember if that was you), etc etc. I can only discuss meaningfully what has been posted... it's sorta silly, IMO, to invent a number of possible situations that [i]could[/i] have been, when we have been given no indication any of them were the case. That would be like... oh... if someone asked you to pick up milk at the store for them, you picking up eggs instead because they might have misspoke. But one thing I am [i]not[/i] doing, despite your accusations, is using these as a base of proof. I'm simply not going to give them the benefit of the unlikely doubt in this case unless I have shred of reason to do so. [/QUOTE]

Verification