Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Would this be too much bookkeeping?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="the Jester" data-source="post: 5143040" data-attributes="member: 1210"><p>I've been working on a D&D system that will take the best things from each edition to build a system that is absolutely perfect for my personal tastes (and prolly okay for some people, not too cool for some others). Anyway, I wanted to get some feedback on whether a mechanic I'm strongly considering requires too much bookkeeping.</p><p></p><p>Basically, instead of powers, anyone can try to pull maneuvers by spending action points. A maneuver might be a bull rush, trip, dual wield, charge, total defense, etc. A character prolly starts the day with somewhere between 4 and 6 action points, and a lot of the tricks you can do require you to spend action points. By the same token, characters will gain more action points quite often. For instance, a fighter gains an action point each time he hits an enemy; he gains 2 APs when he scores a critical hit and he gains 3 APs when he drops a foe. </p><p></p><p>So let's take a hypothetical dwarf fighter in this system, Dwarfy McDwarferson. Each day he starts with 6 APs (4 + 2 for high Strength). He goes adventuring with some useless elf and halfling, and they run into goblins. </p><p></p><p>In the first round, Dwarfy charges (cost: 1 AP) and hits (gain 1 AP). He comes out even at 6 APs.</p><p></p><p>In the second round, he is surrounded, but he's bad ass with his axe and he starts laying about him. Because of his Power Attack feat, he can spend an action point for +2 melee damage, so when he hits (gain 1 AP) he does it (spend 1 AP). This drops the goblin (gain 3 APs), and he now has 9 APs.</p><p></p><p>Then he decides that he needs to kick more ass, because there are still four goblins surrounding him, and he spends 3 APs to take an extra standard action and makes another attack, but he misses. It's close enough that he spends another action point to add 1d6 to his roll, but he still misses, ending the round with 5 APs. </p><p></p><p>Etc... would this be horribly annoying? Or would it be tolerable?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="the Jester, post: 5143040, member: 1210"] I've been working on a D&D system that will take the best things from each edition to build a system that is absolutely perfect for my personal tastes (and prolly okay for some people, not too cool for some others). Anyway, I wanted to get some feedback on whether a mechanic I'm strongly considering requires too much bookkeeping. Basically, instead of powers, anyone can try to pull maneuvers by spending action points. A maneuver might be a bull rush, trip, dual wield, charge, total defense, etc. A character prolly starts the day with somewhere between 4 and 6 action points, and a lot of the tricks you can do require you to spend action points. By the same token, characters will gain more action points quite often. For instance, a fighter gains an action point each time he hits an enemy; he gains 2 APs when he scores a critical hit and he gains 3 APs when he drops a foe. So let's take a hypothetical dwarf fighter in this system, Dwarfy McDwarferson. Each day he starts with 6 APs (4 + 2 for high Strength). He goes adventuring with some useless elf and halfling, and they run into goblins. In the first round, Dwarfy charges (cost: 1 AP) and hits (gain 1 AP). He comes out even at 6 APs. In the second round, he is surrounded, but he's bad ass with his axe and he starts laying about him. Because of his Power Attack feat, he can spend an action point for +2 melee damage, so when he hits (gain 1 AP) he does it (spend 1 AP). This drops the goblin (gain 3 APs), and he now has 9 APs. Then he decides that he needs to kick more ass, because there are still four goblins surrounding him, and he spends 3 APs to take an extra standard action and makes another attack, but he misses. It's close enough that he spends another action point to add 1d6 to his roll, but he still misses, ending the round with 5 APs. Etc... would this be horribly annoying? Or would it be tolerable? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Would this be too much bookkeeping?
Top