Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Would you allow an extra background instead of Feat?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 7488078" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>On second thoughts I would not allow it.</p><p></p><p>There is already a core feat to represent the same thing, <strong>Skilled</strong> which grants a combination of 3 skills or tools proficiencies. Apparently this is the amount of benefits that the designers decided to be appropriate for a feat. A background grants 1 more proficiency (although only 2 can be skills) and a downtime benefit, so getting a background instead of a feat is effectively cheating, because it us absolutely not required for roleplay. </p><p></p><p>The traits / bonds / etc are not mechanical benefits so everyone is free to have as many as they wish.</p><p></p><p>Is one more proficiency a big deal? Does it break the game? NO. But then if you allow this, I want an extra weapon prof because it doesn't break the game. And an extra racial feature from a different race because it doesn't break the game. And one extra known spell because it doesn't break the game...</p><p></p><p>If you give one PC an extra, you either gotta make it a special reward for good playing, or give an equivalent bonus to all PC.</p><p></p><p>But then again if it's not a big deal, why does the PC need it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 7488078, member: 1465"] On second thoughts I would not allow it. There is already a core feat to represent the same thing, [B]Skilled[/B] which grants a combination of 3 skills or tools proficiencies. Apparently this is the amount of benefits that the designers decided to be appropriate for a feat. A background grants 1 more proficiency (although only 2 can be skills) and a downtime benefit, so getting a background instead of a feat is effectively cheating, because it us absolutely not required for roleplay. The traits / bonds / etc are not mechanical benefits so everyone is free to have as many as they wish. Is one more proficiency a big deal? Does it break the game? NO. But then if you allow this, I want an extra weapon prof because it doesn't break the game. And an extra racial feature from a different race because it doesn't break the game. And one extra known spell because it doesn't break the game... If you give one PC an extra, you either gotta make it a special reward for good playing, or give an equivalent bonus to all PC. But then again if it's not a big deal, why does the PC need it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Would you allow an extra background instead of Feat?
Top