Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7427527" data-attributes="member: 6919838">Honestly, without a thorough review of each sub-clasd, i would say no. I dont necessarily think it all balances out that each class has the same divisions of power between main class and sub-class features.These were balanced or tested as packages - class + sub needs tp roughly size up against class +sub. That does not mean that class without sub matches any other class without sub.A hint that the balances were combo vs combo is how some classes get sub class at 1 and others at 3.So, no, i would not start sub-dividing what were built and tested as fused combos and providing an identical replacement without a f'ton of analysis.</blockquote>