Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Torm" data-source="post: 1954114" data-attributes="member: 12706">I have no problem with this Paladin, provided:A. His behavior is not in direct violation of the mandates of his deity (NOT necessarily his church - they ain't the boss of him, ultimately, and they aren't the ones weighing his worthiness to Paladinhood.)andB. He would be required to be certain that he partakes of his "extra-curricular" activities in such a way as to insure that his duty is not in danger of being compromised.In the end, a paladin's attitude towards his duty is far less important than whether or not he gets it done, so I don't really have a problem with his fatalism. Although I would be relatively surprised to see such an individual called in the first place, I guess it would depend on what that deity needed at the time. Who can say? Maybe this Paladin was called to alarm a deity's Paladin Order that is suffering from a slightly slipping morality into straightening up and flying right. Or maybe he will eventually discover he isn't empowered as a Paladin by the deity he thinks he is, at all......So speaks Torm, The True, The Loyal Fury, God of Paladins. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool    :cool:"  data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" /></blockquote>