Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Would you allow this paladin in your game? (new fiction added 11/11/08)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Navar" data-source="post: 2039319" data-attributes="member: 2313"><p>I know this quote is from WAY early in this thread, but all of the points are good. I thought I would throw in my 2 cents.</p><p></p><p>It is correct that a paladin does not require a patron deity, but my comments assume that a "Holy Warrior" has devoted himself to a god. The Champion in Monte Cook's AU is MUCH better for a fighter who is devoted to an ideal.</p><p></p><p>The crux of the reason I voted no is because part of the paladin's code is to "Respect legitimate authority." There are just TOO many legitimate authorities in a paladin's life (IMHO) to have NONE of them have a problem with his whoring and drinking. His god likley will have a problem of getting Sex for Money. If he was a Paladin of Jesus then I would 100% say no (and I think that anyone else would as well.) But I can't think of any god that allows paladins that would be ok with sex for money. Even a god of sex would likley be offended that someone is out there paying for it. Also Church elder's likley don't like having a paladin who pays for sex. </p><p>There are several problems with the sex for money thing (if thought out) brings up. Those women tend to spread diesease. LG churches likley have a problem with something like this. Also they tend to attract women who arn't emotionally steady and allow them to make their lives worse. I think that if the genders on this board were reversed this would have been a resounding NO.</p><p>"Act with honor." is another paladin code option that hurts his paladin. Pride and Professionalism start with your self. Your personal appearance is how you honor not just yourself, but also those around you. In fact I think that paladins likley have a problem with the sin of Pride. But taking care of yourself (wearing nice clean cloths, Shaving, personal hygene in general, etc.) is where honor starts. In fact I would not allow a paladin who didn't take care of himself. This point of the code doesn't depend on a god either. You either have self respect, or you don't, but without self respect then you can't have honor. </p><p>The drinking aspect I am actually OK with depending on 2 conditions.</p><p>#1 He doesn't drink to excess.</p><p>#2 He doesn't spent too much money on the drink.</p><p></p><p>#2 would be a problem though if the paladin liked food too much as well though. I would have a hard time having a paladin who spent 5 gp on every meal because he liked only the finest foods. A truley Pious paladin would have spartan living quarters and simple meals, but great armour, weapons, and holy items. (and simple meals doesn't mean Bad food, plain bread (no mold), simple meat, a vegetable, and good clean water would be great.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Navar, post: 2039319, member: 2313"] I know this quote is from WAY early in this thread, but all of the points are good. I thought I would throw in my 2 cents. It is correct that a paladin does not require a patron deity, but my comments assume that a "Holy Warrior" has devoted himself to a god. The Champion in Monte Cook's AU is MUCH better for a fighter who is devoted to an ideal. The crux of the reason I voted no is because part of the paladin's code is to "Respect legitimate authority." There are just TOO many legitimate authorities in a paladin's life (IMHO) to have NONE of them have a problem with his whoring and drinking. His god likley will have a problem of getting Sex for Money. If he was a Paladin of Jesus then I would 100% say no (and I think that anyone else would as well.) But I can't think of any god that allows paladins that would be ok with sex for money. Even a god of sex would likley be offended that someone is out there paying for it. Also Church elder's likley don't like having a paladin who pays for sex. There are several problems with the sex for money thing (if thought out) brings up. Those women tend to spread diesease. LG churches likley have a problem with something like this. Also they tend to attract women who arn't emotionally steady and allow them to make their lives worse. I think that if the genders on this board were reversed this would have been a resounding NO. "Act with honor." is another paladin code option that hurts his paladin. Pride and Professionalism start with your self. Your personal appearance is how you honor not just yourself, but also those around you. In fact I think that paladins likley have a problem with the sin of Pride. But taking care of yourself (wearing nice clean cloths, Shaving, personal hygene in general, etc.) is where honor starts. In fact I would not allow a paladin who didn't take care of himself. This point of the code doesn't depend on a god either. You either have self respect, or you don't, but without self respect then you can't have honor. The drinking aspect I am actually OK with depending on 2 conditions. #1 He doesn't drink to excess. #2 He doesn't spent too much money on the drink. #2 would be a problem though if the paladin liked food too much as well though. I would have a hard time having a paladin who spent 5 gp on every meal because he liked only the finest foods. A truley Pious paladin would have spartan living quarters and simple meals, but great armour, weapons, and holy items. (and simple meals doesn't mean Bad food, plain bread (no mold), simple meat, a vegetable, and good clean water would be great.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Would you allow this paladin in your game? (new fiction added 11/11/08)
Top