Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Would you allow this paladin in your game? (new fiction added 11/11/08)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Torm" data-source="post: 2052637" data-attributes="member: 12706"><p>Well, there is a certain amount of, "what do I deserve?" involved, too, when it comes to being punished. Once again, you can take this back to what the general answer would be in, say, a poll of 1000 people. "What would you think you deserve to have happen to you if you killed someone else for monetary gain?"</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, no one seems to really be doing these polls I speak of for consensus. Which is a shame, IMO, because without them to allow a more objective sentencing for crimes, it frequently does come down to the individual judge or juror - "What am <strong>I</strong> comfortable with doing to <em>someone else</em> as punishment for this?" Which isn't the same question at all, and is frequently less than they would expect to have happen if they did it <em>themselves</em>. :\ People sometimes like to be gracious and "civilized," so they are lenient. OR, they are forced to ask themselves, individually, "What would I expect to happen to me?" Which is probably a little better, but they still have no way of knowing whether or not their individual answer deviates significantly from the general consensus of the society they are supposed to be serving as a judge or juror. If we had a societal consensus, up front and refreshed from time to time (maybe with the census) of what we consider to be fair to be done to ourselves if we commit specific crimes, that burden would be taken off of them somewhat, and society as a whole would feel that it was served better by the court systems than it is now.</p><p></p><p>(Of course, fixing the whole plea bargaining arrangement would help too. But that's not directly relevant to what we're discussing.)</p><p></p><p></p><p>Maybe at this time. But, that is only a failing of <em>current</em> psychological knowledge, not an indicator that they won't be at some point in the future. I believe that, if mankind survives long enough, we will eventually understand the root causes of most behavior - all behavior, "deviant" or not, will be diagnosable and potentally "treatable." I only hope that at that point we will have the good sense to place the line between acceptable variance and unacceptable deviance somewhere that still allows for plenty of diversity and individual expression, or we'll doom ourselves.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Torm, post: 2052637, member: 12706"] Well, there is a certain amount of, "what do I deserve?" involved, too, when it comes to being punished. Once again, you can take this back to what the general answer would be in, say, a poll of 1000 people. "What would you think you deserve to have happen to you if you killed someone else for monetary gain?" Unfortunately, no one seems to really be doing these polls I speak of for consensus. Which is a shame, IMO, because without them to allow a more objective sentencing for crimes, it frequently does come down to the individual judge or juror - "What am [B]I[/B] comfortable with doing to [I]someone else[/I] as punishment for this?" Which isn't the same question at all, and is frequently less than they would expect to have happen if they did it [I]themselves[/I]. :\ People sometimes like to be gracious and "civilized," so they are lenient. OR, they are forced to ask themselves, individually, "What would I expect to happen to me?" Which is probably a little better, but they still have no way of knowing whether or not their individual answer deviates significantly from the general consensus of the society they are supposed to be serving as a judge or juror. If we had a societal consensus, up front and refreshed from time to time (maybe with the census) of what we consider to be fair to be done to ourselves if we commit specific crimes, that burden would be taken off of them somewhat, and society as a whole would feel that it was served better by the court systems than it is now. (Of course, fixing the whole plea bargaining arrangement would help too. But that's not directly relevant to what we're discussing.) Maybe at this time. But, that is only a failing of [I]current[/I] psychological knowledge, not an indicator that they won't be at some point in the future. I believe that, if mankind survives long enough, we will eventually understand the root causes of most behavior - all behavior, "deviant" or not, will be diagnosable and potentally "treatable." I only hope that at that point we will have the good sense to place the line between acceptable variance and unacceptable deviance somewhere that still allows for plenty of diversity and individual expression, or we'll doom ourselves. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Would you allow this paladin in your game? (new fiction added 11/11/08)
Top