Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Would you be fine with classes that you can't always play but are better than base classes?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Corinnguard" data-source="post: 9251536" data-attributes="member: 7033886"><p>Agreed. PF1's archetypes are lot simpler and easier to understand and implement that PF2's archetypes. They altered a feature here, replaced another feature there, and you had something that came very close IMO to what you wanted your character to have. The only major drawback that the PF1 archetypes had was that you really couldn't stack more class archetype together if they altered/replaced the same class features. PF2's take on the archetypes by the way of archetype feats was an attempt to fix that problem. Just take the dedication feat and two of the archetype feats of a given archetype, and then you could go pick up a second dedication feat and get the benefits of another archetype. </p><p></p><p>Btw, I know of at least two Magus archetypes in PF1 that can be stacked. The Staff Magus and the Card Caster Magus. They work especially well if paired with a certain Cajun-speaking Tiefling named Gambit. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Corinnguard, post: 9251536, member: 7033886"] Agreed. PF1's archetypes are lot simpler and easier to understand and implement that PF2's archetypes. They altered a feature here, replaced another feature there, and you had something that came very close IMO to what you wanted your character to have. The only major drawback that the PF1 archetypes had was that you really couldn't stack more class archetype together if they altered/replaced the same class features. PF2's take on the archetypes by the way of archetype feats was an attempt to fix that problem. Just take the dedication feat and two of the archetype feats of a given archetype, and then you could go pick up a second dedication feat and get the benefits of another archetype. Btw, I know of at least two Magus archetypes in PF1 that can be stacked. The Staff Magus and the Card Caster Magus. They work especially well if paired with a certain Cajun-speaking Tiefling named Gambit. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Would you be fine with classes that you can't always play but are better than base classes?
Top