Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="FrogReaver" data-source="post: 7548719" data-attributes="member: 6795602">He asked a question about whether class features should be able to internally call out multiclassing and behave differently when it is done.&nbsp; The basic premise is that some features can be fine for a single classed character but be too strong for a multiclassed character.&nbsp; I don't think there's any way to argue with this premise.&nbsp; So is the way to address this issue with text that such a feature behaves differently when multiclassed?&nbsp; I think that's a fine solution.&nbsp; What do you think?He's talking about class features.&nbsp; If you took 5 seconds to actually consider what he was saying then you would understand that the feature he was proposing was one that all fighters automatically got as a class feature.&nbsp; He's saying if something like this was a fighter class feature would it be bad because it address multiclassing within the feature.The question isn't if that particular feature is okay but if features that behave differently for mutliclassed characters are acceptable.&nbsp; That is just one example of many that he could have cited.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="FrogReaver, post: 7548719, member: 6795602"] He asked a question about whether class features should be able to internally call out multiclassing and behave differently when it is done. The basic premise is that some features can be fine for a single classed character but be too strong for a multiclassed character. I don't think there's any way to argue with this premise. So is the way to address this issue with text that such a feature behaves differently when multiclassed? I think that's a fine solution. What do you think? He's talking about class features. If you took 5 seconds to actually consider what he was saying then you would understand that the feature he was proposing was one that all fighters automatically got as a class feature. He's saying if something like this was a fighter class feature would it be bad because it address multiclassing within the feature. The question isn't if that particular feature is okay but if features that behave differently for mutliclassed characters are acceptable. That is just one example of many that he could have cited. [/QUOTE]

Verification