Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 3332112" data-attributes="member: 1465">I quite feel like that, I don't probably care about the system too much, and this is why I don't want to try others.Well... it's not that I would refuse to play with another ruleset  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> but only that I'm not looking for it. I ultimately think that another system wouldn't probably make my hobby noticeably better, so while reading a new rulebook can be always interesting, switching the game to it requires some time & effort that I would rather spend on preparing a good campaign <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I don't even try to change much of 3.0 with house rules: I always come up with HR ideas and variants all the time, but at the end I just want to play or run some adventures, and it's easier for me to just stick with the common rules.edit: while I still play with D&D 3.0, I wouldn't consider 3.5 to be different system, and neither d20 really. I will certainly play some d20 Modern adventure early or late, but I would feel like it's basically the same game!</blockquote>