Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dice4Hire" data-source="post: 4152610" data-attributes="member: 55066">Whether anyone agrees with me about Dungeon and Dragon being 3rd party is a bit off the topic. I held them up as examples of something that was possible with having 3.x open. If there had been no SRd, I suppose the magazines could have been published anyway, under a more restrictive contract with WOTC, but it is doubtful that that wold have happened, as there would be no Paizo, or many other gamin companies out there.Whether anyone likes the two magazines or not, (I did not like Dragon), I think they can be accepted as an example of how other companies were able to add to 3.x due to the open content.But with my vote, I said I do not really care if it is open or not. I will buy 4E and probably play it extensively, side by side with 3.5. I will be happy with 4E and the products WOTC puts out, but I know a lot of people would prefer to see a broader supply of products.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dice4Hire, post: 4152610, member: 55066"] Whether anyone agrees with me about Dungeon and Dragon being 3rd party is a bit off the topic. I held them up as examples of something that was possible with having 3.x open. If there had been no SRd, I suppose the magazines could have been published anyway, under a more restrictive contract with WOTC, but it is doubtful that that wold have happened, as there would be no Paizo, or many other gamin companies out there. Whether anyone likes the two magazines or not, (I did not like Dragon), I think they can be accepted as an example of how other companies were able to add to 3.x due to the open content. But with my vote, I said I do not really care if it is open or not. I will buy 4E and probably play it extensively, side by side with 3.5. I will be happy with 4E and the products WOTC puts out, but I know a lot of people would prefer to see a broader supply of products. [/QUOTE]

Verification