Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Crazy Jerome" data-source="post: 5506511" data-attributes="member: 54877">In theory, I'd do the same.  In practice, the chances of a 4.5 being something that I would like on the merits approaches zero so closely that you can't wedge a sliver of daylight between them. I suppose it is possible that the management, design team, developers, etc. could put out this great new version of D&D that both built on the foundation of what came before yet also had advances that were its own.  And the direction of game was clearly thought through, with goals that very much made it a new edition, and well-executed.  And then a new senior manager is brought on board who--for reasons only an abberant brain could fathom--decided to totally misname this paragon product "D&D 4.5". And I could win the lottery tomorrow without buying a ticket. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/angel.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":angel:" title="Angel    :angel:" data-shortname=":angel:" /></blockquote>