Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Would you buy/play a blatantly racist or sexist campaign setting?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kenjib" data-source="post: 523132" data-attributes="member: 530"><p>They are not. I haven't seen that asserted anywhere. If a game came out which actively endorsed the rape, torture, and murder of innocent people for pleasure, I would most certainly not support such a game either.</p><p></p><p>As with most people here, games with these elements are fine. Racist and sexist cultural elements in context are perhaps even to be expected in a living, breathing, game world. However, every fantasy world has a moral framework, whether or not anyone chooses to acknowledge it. If this moral framework endorses these activities, then I the game is morally offensive to me (I don't speak for anyone else of course) and I will not support it. If it presents these activities are part of the world in a negative fashion than I think including these things is just fine. Furthermore, I would argue that including these things in a neutrally historical manner also implicitly portrays them in a negative fashion, because most of us inherently view this historical conditions as negatives. Furthermore a more impartial handling allows us to apply our own morality to it, satisfying people of all sorts.</p><p></p><p>So, they are only a problem to me when presented in a positive manner and/or are actively endorsed and supported by the system.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure you can make those arguments and that's fine. That doesn't at all contradict my argument though, which is that creating a game system that inherently supports and reinforces racism and sexism is not something I would support. You've gone off on a tangent.</p><p></p><p>Your new example of demon summoning doesn't really hold up. First of all, the D&D game is a game biased towards heroes, and the demons and evils they are supposed to overcome. As I've said above, it's fine with me to include racism in the same light as long as it's okay with everyone else I'm playing with. Second, the people you mention who are upset by demon summoning do not play the game precisely because of this, so they have spoken in the same manner that I would against a racist or sexist game. This is the same thing I'm saying. If the game supports things I find offensive, I won't support it.</p><p></p><p>Because those who tie D&D to demon worship are a minority in our society (compared to people who disapprove of racism and sexism) this does not currently impact the market to a point where the publishers are influenced -- although this did happen in the 80's. The problem with what happened in the 80's was that the influence was directed not only from a vocal minority, but from a vocal minority who did not play the game effecting a market that did not include anyone in that vocal minority. By comparison, not including racism and sexism is a trend pressed by a majority at large that is also the majority of the playing population.</p><p></p><p>Also, like Buttercup, I've never said anything about banning. In fact, the people who don't like demon worshipping (who, conveniently, you mentioned as a foil to myself) are the ones who advocate banning.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kenjib, post: 523132, member: 530"] They are not. I haven't seen that asserted anywhere. If a game came out which actively endorsed the rape, torture, and murder of innocent people for pleasure, I would most certainly not support such a game either. As with most people here, games with these elements are fine. Racist and sexist cultural elements in context are perhaps even to be expected in a living, breathing, game world. However, every fantasy world has a moral framework, whether or not anyone chooses to acknowledge it. If this moral framework endorses these activities, then I the game is morally offensive to me (I don't speak for anyone else of course) and I will not support it. If it presents these activities are part of the world in a negative fashion than I think including these things is just fine. Furthermore, I would argue that including these things in a neutrally historical manner also implicitly portrays them in a negative fashion, because most of us inherently view this historical conditions as negatives. Furthermore a more impartial handling allows us to apply our own morality to it, satisfying people of all sorts. So, they are only a problem to me when presented in a positive manner and/or are actively endorsed and supported by the system. Sure you can make those arguments and that's fine. That doesn't at all contradict my argument though, which is that creating a game system that inherently supports and reinforces racism and sexism is not something I would support. You've gone off on a tangent. Your new example of demon summoning doesn't really hold up. First of all, the D&D game is a game biased towards heroes, and the demons and evils they are supposed to overcome. As I've said above, it's fine with me to include racism in the same light as long as it's okay with everyone else I'm playing with. Second, the people you mention who are upset by demon summoning do not play the game precisely because of this, so they have spoken in the same manner that I would against a racist or sexist game. This is the same thing I'm saying. If the game supports things I find offensive, I won't support it. Because those who tie D&D to demon worship are a minority in our society (compared to people who disapprove of racism and sexism) this does not currently impact the market to a point where the publishers are influenced -- although this did happen in the 80's. The problem with what happened in the 80's was that the influence was directed not only from a vocal minority, but from a vocal minority who did not play the game effecting a market that did not include anyone in that vocal minority. By comparison, not including racism and sexism is a trend pressed by a majority at large that is also the majority of the playing population. Also, like Buttercup, I've never said anything about banning. In fact, the people who don't like demon worshipping (who, conveniently, you mentioned as a foil to myself) are the ones who advocate banning. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Would you buy/play a blatantly racist or sexist campaign setting?
Top