Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Would you change a monster's hit points mid-fight?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elf Witch" data-source="post: 6596134" data-attributes="member: 9037"><p>I have a question those of you adamantly opposed to ever fudging where do you fall on the player type according to Robin's Rules of Good game mastering? As a player are you more of power gamer or tactitrcan as opposed to a method actor or story teller?</p><p></p><p>The reason I am asking this is because I do think what kicks you get out as a player influence you as a DM. Power gamers, butt kickers and especially tacticians rely on knowing the rules and making their choices of play based on the rules. So if a DM fudges or uses rule O that can be seen as mitigating their choices and thus interfering in what they enjoy in the game.</p><p></p><p>But there are more ways to play then just this and the method actors and story tellers have as much right to enjoy the game as the other type of players and for them never fudging even if that means denying them what they most enjoy in a game is seen as bad DMing. </p><p></p><p>So as a DM don't you think part of your job is to identify what your players like best and try and accommodate them to some extent. There has been a lot of talk about dishonesty here and one thing I consider very dishonest is a DM who is not upfront with players and does not comes out and says I think your style of role play is badfun and I have no intention of ever accommodating you as a player. Because that is what I am reading here with words like cheating and cheaters being thrown around to describe rule O. </p><p></p><p>I don't think that there is a badfun way to play the game I do acknowledge that there are different play styles. </p><p></p><p>One of the biggest issues when it comes to players and DMs having issues that ruins the fun for them is based on miscommunication. I consider it a huge miscommunication when a DM does not acknowledge that maybe because of their own prejudice on styles of play that they should not be the DM for certain players. Just talking to players is often enough to get an idea on what they want out of a game. If you can bring yourself to bend to allow a certain playstyle in your game then you need to be honest and say that. </p><p></p><p>For myself I hate DMing for casual players I will play with them but I am upfront that as a DM they annoy me and are not a good fit for my table. I will also be upfront that if you are mainly a butt kicker looking for a game that is mainly butt kicking then you most likely won't have fun in my game. This is not a judgement that they play wrong just that they play differently.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elf Witch, post: 6596134, member: 9037"] I have a question those of you adamantly opposed to ever fudging where do you fall on the player type according to Robin's Rules of Good game mastering? As a player are you more of power gamer or tactitrcan as opposed to a method actor or story teller? The reason I am asking this is because I do think what kicks you get out as a player influence you as a DM. Power gamers, butt kickers and especially tacticians rely on knowing the rules and making their choices of play based on the rules. So if a DM fudges or uses rule O that can be seen as mitigating their choices and thus interfering in what they enjoy in the game. But there are more ways to play then just this and the method actors and story tellers have as much right to enjoy the game as the other type of players and for them never fudging even if that means denying them what they most enjoy in a game is seen as bad DMing. So as a DM don't you think part of your job is to identify what your players like best and try and accommodate them to some extent. There has been a lot of talk about dishonesty here and one thing I consider very dishonest is a DM who is not upfront with players and does not comes out and says I think your style of role play is badfun and I have no intention of ever accommodating you as a player. Because that is what I am reading here with words like cheating and cheaters being thrown around to describe rule O. I don't think that there is a badfun way to play the game I do acknowledge that there are different play styles. One of the biggest issues when it comes to players and DMs having issues that ruins the fun for them is based on miscommunication. I consider it a huge miscommunication when a DM does not acknowledge that maybe because of their own prejudice on styles of play that they should not be the DM for certain players. Just talking to players is often enough to get an idea on what they want out of a game. If you can bring yourself to bend to allow a certain playstyle in your game then you need to be honest and say that. For myself I hate DMing for casual players I will play with them but I am upfront that as a DM they annoy me and are not a good fit for my table. I will also be upfront that if you are mainly a butt kicker looking for a game that is mainly butt kicking then you most likely won't have fun in my game. This is not a judgement that they play wrong just that they play differently. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Would you change a monster's hit points mid-fight?
Top