Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Would you change a monster's hit points mid-fight?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bacon Bits" data-source="post: 6599274" data-attributes="member: 6777737"><p>There is no objective answer. They're rhetorical questions. If you're trying to answer the questions and present an argument to me instead of reflecting on why I asked those questions, you've failed to understand why they were asked.</p><p></p><p>The idea is to get people to explore what is and isn't cheating. Some people here seem very adamant that changing max hp during an encounter isn't "fair." If that's the case in their world, then I'd like to understand where fairness ends and cheating begins. I think if someone feels as strongly about it as this thread length implies that that should not be a difficult task.</p><p></p><p>So, I ask again: Is it fair to set an NPC's hp to maximum hp? Is it fair to do that *after* initiative? Is that *really* that different? Is it fair to set an NPC's hp to higher than maximum hp? Is it fair to do that *before* initiative? So, is it fair to set *all* NPCs to maximum hp? </p><p></p><p>600+ replies in and nobody has come up with a good answer. It's time to explore different models because the example presented by OP is not adequate any longer.</p><p></p><p>Look, the point of a discussion is not to win. This isn't a trial. There ain't no judge. There ain't no jury. This isn't high school debate. There ain't nobody polling the audience. Ain't nobody going to give you a root beer and pizza party. The point of a discussion is to understand what the other person is thinking. To give yourself another perspective to consider. If you go into a discussion with the goal of legitimately changing someone's mind even when they disagree with you, you're not going to do it. You can keep arguing and make sure that you get the last word. That's all you'll get, though. But ain't nobody going to hear it. Worse, by going in with the mindset that you're going to win or change someone else's mind, you're not keeping an open mind yourself. If you're not open to what other people say, and don't honestly consider their opinions, why should they continue to do the same? And if they're not listening to you... well, what's even the point?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bacon Bits, post: 6599274, member: 6777737"] There is no objective answer. They're rhetorical questions. If you're trying to answer the questions and present an argument to me instead of reflecting on why I asked those questions, you've failed to understand why they were asked. The idea is to get people to explore what is and isn't cheating. Some people here seem very adamant that changing max hp during an encounter isn't "fair." If that's the case in their world, then I'd like to understand where fairness ends and cheating begins. I think if someone feels as strongly about it as this thread length implies that that should not be a difficult task. So, I ask again: Is it fair to set an NPC's hp to maximum hp? Is it fair to do that *after* initiative? Is that *really* that different? Is it fair to set an NPC's hp to higher than maximum hp? Is it fair to do that *before* initiative? So, is it fair to set *all* NPCs to maximum hp? 600+ replies in and nobody has come up with a good answer. It's time to explore different models because the example presented by OP is not adequate any longer. Look, the point of a discussion is not to win. This isn't a trial. There ain't no judge. There ain't no jury. This isn't high school debate. There ain't nobody polling the audience. Ain't nobody going to give you a root beer and pizza party. The point of a discussion is to understand what the other person is thinking. To give yourself another perspective to consider. If you go into a discussion with the goal of legitimately changing someone's mind even when they disagree with you, you're not going to do it. You can keep arguing and make sure that you get the last word. That's all you'll get, though. But ain't nobody going to hear it. Worse, by going in with the mindset that you're going to win or change someone else's mind, you're not keeping an open mind yourself. If you're not open to what other people say, and don't honestly consider their opinions, why should they continue to do the same? And if they're not listening to you... well, what's even the point? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Would you change a monster's hit points mid-fight?
Top