Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5246929" data-attributes="member: 61155">It is an interesting idea because, in the end, people can act very different towards different groups.  I ran a game where I had Alignment as somewhat similar - it was a setting focused around a human Empire as pretty much the total of civilization, so I didn't really have to worry about different behaviors towards different groups. The Good and Evil axis measured how far one was willing to go to protect whomever one cared about; while the Law and Chaos axis measured whether one cared about society as a whole or just one's self.  Here's the breakdown I sent out to the players to try and represent this:   Lawful Good: Champion: A cornerstone of the Empire, who works for the good of all. Lawful Neutral: Arbiter: A strict believer in the ways of the Empire, who approaches each situation as the law demands. Lawful Evil: Enforcer: Those who enact the Empire's will, who do what it takes to preserve society against all threats. Neutral Good: Idealist: A believer in good deeds, who seeks to do right for those around them. True Neutral: Contemplative: One who considers all sides before taking action, and makes decisions as appropriate to whatever situation lies before them. Neutral Evil: Realist: One who does whatever it takes to protect or advance those close to them. Chaotic Good: Vigilante: A rebel that nonetheless seeks to right wrongs when they see them being done, a wanderer whose stock in trade is random acts of kindness. Chaotic Neutral: Loner: One who isolates themself from the world and who deals with each situation as they personally think is right. Chaotic Evil: Survivor: One who puts their own safety or success above all others. In addition, I had a 'Corruption Score' to represent true evil, whether genuinely disturbed madness or those tainted by dark powers.</blockquote>

Verification