Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pielorinho" data-source="post: 638790" data-attributes="member: 259">I totally agree, and hope that Drawmack is exaggerating for the sake of making a point (even if the point is that he's one crazy badass <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes    :rolleyes:"  data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> ).Nonetheless, I think my description of how the experience would benefit the paladin's faith is wholly sufficient for explaining why a paladin would gain experience from the situation.  Indeed, it's a little bit weird that if a paladin hung back in the party while the rogue successfully disarmed the trap, the paladin would gain more experience than if the paladin walked through the traps, protected by the mantle of his faith.One last point:  I'm guessing this isn't a huge amount of experience we're talking about, right?  If so, why fret over it?  If the player wants the experience, and there's a reasonably good case to make for his getting it, give it to him.(I may be misreading you:  it may be that the player is unaware of the potential for experience here, and you're just being uber-cautious, soliciting other opinions before deciding on XP awards.  If so, ignore the last paragraph).Daniel</blockquote>