Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
would you let a PC learn a non spell magic power?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Willie the Duck" data-source="post: 8638602" data-attributes="member: 6799660"><p>My group has had (over almost 40 years and massively multiple editions) characters who have become lycanthropes, vampires, liches, talking skeletons (misworded wish to get back ally turned undead), sentient animals (reincarnation), a displacer beast, a frail caster permanently taken over a muscle bound enemy's body using magic jar, and IIRC a treent character who met their demise in a sawmill becoming a sentient sailing vessel. I would have no issue with a character picking up (non-game-breaking) powers as the story presents itself.</p><p></p><p>That said, none of this has changed or been affected by the new books using 'spell-like abilities.' I agree with Umbran that these are gaming conventions and you have to decide on a case by case basis what they represent and how one might obtain those abilities.</p><p></p><p>Yeah. In my mind, those are spell-casters, and there's already multiple PC-facing methods for picking up spellcasting -- classes, feats, archetype choices, etc. I don't know if the new implementation moving even more away from PC-monster symmetry will be an improvement or not, but I get the reasoning and in my mind a MM mage is still a mage, etc.</p><p></p><p>'Run into a mage and decide to start learning magic' is more consistent, but I'd say that biological abilities makes for a more interesting story. Think about all the superhero origins that come from 'ran into a _____ and gained ____-like powers' (or, as mentioned in the She-Hulk thread, get a blood transfusion).</p><p></p><p>The #1 thing I think Boons have going for them is that they are explicitly at the DM's discretion*. That makes it easier to say no to that one spell that will be disruptive but yes to the other spell (maybe of the same level and class list) that is just plain fun and in no way disruptive.</p><p><em><span style="font-size: 9px">*yes, all things are DM-gated in theory.</span></em></p><p></p><p>There was a PrC like that at the cusp of 3.0 and 3.5 (<em>Illithid Savant</em>, from Savage Species). I think the issue with such codification was that not all abilities are equal in power, so the effort to balance such a class is pretty much impossible (especially the instant your DM uses any third-party monsters).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Willie the Duck, post: 8638602, member: 6799660"] My group has had (over almost 40 years and massively multiple editions) characters who have become lycanthropes, vampires, liches, talking skeletons (misworded wish to get back ally turned undead), sentient animals (reincarnation), a displacer beast, a frail caster permanently taken over a muscle bound enemy's body using magic jar, and IIRC a treent character who met their demise in a sawmill becoming a sentient sailing vessel. I would have no issue with a character picking up (non-game-breaking) powers as the story presents itself. That said, none of this has changed or been affected by the new books using 'spell-like abilities.' I agree with Umbran that these are gaming conventions and you have to decide on a case by case basis what they represent and how one might obtain those abilities. Yeah. In my mind, those are spell-casters, and there's already multiple PC-facing methods for picking up spellcasting -- classes, feats, archetype choices, etc. I don't know if the new implementation moving even more away from PC-monster symmetry will be an improvement or not, but I get the reasoning and in my mind a MM mage is still a mage, etc. 'Run into a mage and decide to start learning magic' is more consistent, but I'd say that biological abilities makes for a more interesting story. Think about all the superhero origins that come from 'ran into a _____ and gained ____-like powers' (or, as mentioned in the She-Hulk thread, get a blood transfusion). The #1 thing I think Boons have going for them is that they are explicitly at the DM's discretion*. That makes it easier to say no to that one spell that will be disruptive but yes to the other spell (maybe of the same level and class list) that is just plain fun and in no way disruptive. [I][SIZE=1]*yes, all things are DM-gated in theory.[/SIZE][/I] There was a PrC like that at the cusp of 3.0 and 3.5 ([I]Illithid Savant[/I], from Savage Species). I think the issue with such codification was that not all abilities are equal in power, so the effort to balance such a class is pretty much impossible (especially the instant your DM uses any third-party monsters). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
would you let a PC learn a non spell magic power?
Top