Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Would you like to see Psionics as core rules?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dark Psion" data-source="post: 645763" data-attributes="member: 959"><p><strong>Psionics Unearthed</strong></p><p></p><p>BTW, has everyone read Monte's Design Diary update for his "Arcana Unearthed" books?</p><p>Here's the link: <a href="http://www.montecook.com/diary.html" target="_blank">http://www.montecook.com/diary.html</a></p><p></p><p>"This week, I thought I'd talk more about the new magic system in Arcana Unearthed.</p><p></p><p>Casting Spells</p><p>It's simple, really. Like I said last week, each class has access to either simple or both simple and complex spells. You have a set number of spells that you can "ready" on a given day, based on your level and an ability score. "Ready" simply means that you've got the spell all set to go when you need it. (You don't lose the readied status of a spell if you cast it. It's more like how a sorcerer knows certain spells, except that your chosen readied spells can change each day if you wish.) If you can ready four 1st-level spells per day, they can be four different 1st-level spells from day to day. No spellbooks involved. No memorization and forgetting*. And the numbers of spells you can ready isn't so small that it forces repetition (and you can change them every day).</p><p></p><p>You also have a set number of "slots" each day to cast your spells with. So, if you've got three 1st-level slots, you can cast any three of the four 1st-level spells you have prepared. In any combination. So you can cast one spell four times, four different spells, two spells twice, or whatever.</p><p></p><p>So far, it sounds like it's just a combination of the way sorcerers and wizards work, right? Well, that's intentional. I wanted to keep it both simple and not drastically different than what people are used to (and I wanted to keep the spells themselves pretty compatible with regular spells). </p><p></p><p>But I didn't stop there. The two really different aspects are:</p><p></p><p>1. Casters can "weave" multiple lower-level slots to cast higher-level spells, or a single higher-level slot to cast multiple lower-level spells. This adds a great deal of flexibility.</p><p></p><p>2. Spells have prescribed diminished and heightened effects in their descriptions to tell you what happens if you cast the spell using a slot one level lower or one level higher than the spell itself. This effectively makes every spell into three similar but different spells. For example, there's a spell that animates a melee weapon to go attack for you. It attacks as if you're wielding it. The diminished version suffers a -2 penalty to attack rolls and can take only partial actions. The heightened version allows you to use your spellcasting ability score modifier rather than your Strength to use to determine attack bonus and damage. I'm proud of this innovation, because it adds a great deal of flavor to each spell and allows casters a lot more choices. You don't have to take a feat to use these diminished or heightened versions. If you've got the spell readied, you've automatically got all three versions readied.</p><p></p><p>It's All in the Categorization</p><p>So all spells are categorized as simple, complex or exotic. I also took a concept that worked great in 3E and expounded upon it -- the idea of spell descriptors. You know, the bit after the school that tells you it's a [fire] spell. That's great, because it lumps spells together in meaningful ways. You can say, "He adds +2 to the DC of all fire spells he casts," and the statement has clear meaning.</p><p></p><p>So I've added more to that. For example, I've discovered that most players were surprised to learn that there was a [fire] descriptor and a [cold] descriptor but not an [air] descriptor or one for earth or water. So I've added them, and made it really mean something for a spell to be an air spell. So if your character concept is that you want to be a wind mage, it's easy to pick your spells appropriately. You can even take a special feat that will make your [air] spells all have some new and funky qualities, thus giving you good incentive to be a wind mage. Or a fire mage. And so on.</p><p></p><p>One of the new descriptors is [psionic]. Now, for those of you who are hard-core psionic separatists (championing the cause that psionics are completely different than magic) this might be an innovation you don't like. But for those who want to see psionics integrated into the core of the game system, I think you'll be happy. Psionic "spells" affect minds, telekinetically move objects, and do all the other things you expect from psionics. Psionic mages, however, can use them with purely mental actions-no somatic or verbal components (you pay a feat to be a psionic mage). The mind witch class (a subtype of the witch class, which I'll explain more about in a future diary entry) gets the psionic mage feat for free at mid levels and has access to all spells with psionic descriptor, whether they are simple or complex. That's pretty close to a psionic-flavored class right there in the core of the system. You'll really have to see the mind witch write-up and the psionic "spells" to know what I mean, but I think I've given you an idea of where I'm going. (I even put the word "spells" in quotes when it comes to psionic "spells" in this diary entry, because the actual text of the book provides for simply calling them powers, to help keep the flavor of the two separate.)"</p><p>---------------</p><p></p><p></p><p>It looks like we will be seeing a psionics system incorporated into D&D rules, just not from WoC.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dark Psion, post: 645763, member: 959"] [b]Psionics Unearthed[/b] BTW, has everyone read Monte's Design Diary update for his "Arcana Unearthed" books? Here's the link: [url]http://www.montecook.com/diary.html[/url] "This week, I thought I'd talk more about the new magic system in Arcana Unearthed. Casting Spells It's simple, really. Like I said last week, each class has access to either simple or both simple and complex spells. You have a set number of spells that you can "ready" on a given day, based on your level and an ability score. "Ready" simply means that you've got the spell all set to go when you need it. (You don't lose the readied status of a spell if you cast it. It's more like how a sorcerer knows certain spells, except that your chosen readied spells can change each day if you wish.) If you can ready four 1st-level spells per day, they can be four different 1st-level spells from day to day. No spellbooks involved. No memorization and forgetting*. And the numbers of spells you can ready isn't so small that it forces repetition (and you can change them every day). You also have a set number of "slots" each day to cast your spells with. So, if you've got three 1st-level slots, you can cast any three of the four 1st-level spells you have prepared. In any combination. So you can cast one spell four times, four different spells, two spells twice, or whatever. So far, it sounds like it's just a combination of the way sorcerers and wizards work, right? Well, that's intentional. I wanted to keep it both simple and not drastically different than what people are used to (and I wanted to keep the spells themselves pretty compatible with regular spells). But I didn't stop there. The two really different aspects are: 1. Casters can "weave" multiple lower-level slots to cast higher-level spells, or a single higher-level slot to cast multiple lower-level spells. This adds a great deal of flexibility. 2. Spells have prescribed diminished and heightened effects in their descriptions to tell you what happens if you cast the spell using a slot one level lower or one level higher than the spell itself. This effectively makes every spell into three similar but different spells. For example, there's a spell that animates a melee weapon to go attack for you. It attacks as if you're wielding it. The diminished version suffers a -2 penalty to attack rolls and can take only partial actions. The heightened version allows you to use your spellcasting ability score modifier rather than your Strength to use to determine attack bonus and damage. I'm proud of this innovation, because it adds a great deal of flavor to each spell and allows casters a lot more choices. You don't have to take a feat to use these diminished or heightened versions. If you've got the spell readied, you've automatically got all three versions readied. It's All in the Categorization So all spells are categorized as simple, complex or exotic. I also took a concept that worked great in 3E and expounded upon it -- the idea of spell descriptors. You know, the bit after the school that tells you it's a [fire] spell. That's great, because it lumps spells together in meaningful ways. You can say, "He adds +2 to the DC of all fire spells he casts," and the statement has clear meaning. So I've added more to that. For example, I've discovered that most players were surprised to learn that there was a [fire] descriptor and a [cold] descriptor but not an [air] descriptor or one for earth or water. So I've added them, and made it really mean something for a spell to be an air spell. So if your character concept is that you want to be a wind mage, it's easy to pick your spells appropriately. You can even take a special feat that will make your [air] spells all have some new and funky qualities, thus giving you good incentive to be a wind mage. Or a fire mage. And so on. One of the new descriptors is [psionic]. Now, for those of you who are hard-core psionic separatists (championing the cause that psionics are completely different than magic) this might be an innovation you don't like. But for those who want to see psionics integrated into the core of the game system, I think you'll be happy. Psionic "spells" affect minds, telekinetically move objects, and do all the other things you expect from psionics. Psionic mages, however, can use them with purely mental actions-no somatic or verbal components (you pay a feat to be a psionic mage). The mind witch class (a subtype of the witch class, which I'll explain more about in a future diary entry) gets the psionic mage feat for free at mid levels and has access to all spells with psionic descriptor, whether they are simple or complex. That's pretty close to a psionic-flavored class right there in the core of the system. You'll really have to see the mind witch write-up and the psionic "spells" to know what I mean, but I think I've given you an idea of where I'm going. (I even put the word "spells" in quotes when it comes to psionic "spells" in this diary entry, because the actual text of the book provides for simply calling them powers, to help keep the flavor of the two separate.)" --------------- It looks like we will be seeing a psionics system incorporated into D&D rules, just not from WoC. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Would you like to see Psionics as core rules?
Top