Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition (A5E)
Would you participate in a closed Voidrunner playtest?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Morrus" data-source="post: 9286540" data-attributes="member: 1"><p>I'm just gauging interest here. <em>Voidrunner's Codex</em> is such a big project for us that we'd like to get as much play testing on it as possible. My Thursday night game is <em>Voidrunner </em>right now, and we put out some public playtest packs a year or so ago.</p><p></p><p>What would be helpful is a dozen or so reliable people we can give the finished (as in laid-out, pretty) chapters to one at a time as sort of 'playtest packets' and get feedback on. We'd love actual playtest feedback (i.e. if you have the character creation chapter, actually make a few characters), as often things don't work in-game the way they read, but eyes-on reading feedback is helpful too. We're after more detailed feedback than the survey-based feedback we did previously.</p><p></p><p>You'd need to set aside personal preference stuff and evaluate the content as it is--i.e. if you don't like the 'idea' of a particular approach to something, set that aside and evaluate whether it works, not whether you personally like that approach. We're not asking you to change the game to something else, just to playtest it and make sure it works and isn't broken.</p><p></p><p>It would be a closed test, as we want to make sure this thing is <em>right</em> before we put out public previews.</p><p></p><p>Timescales would be tight--we'd need feedback a couple of weeks after each packet drops (although there may be longer gaps between packets, mainly depending on layout speeds).</p><p></p><p>Thoughts? Would any folk here be interested in participating?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Morrus, post: 9286540, member: 1"] I'm just gauging interest here. [I]Voidrunner's Codex[/I] is such a big project for us that we'd like to get as much play testing on it as possible. My Thursday night game is [I]Voidrunner [/I]right now, and we put out some public playtest packs a year or so ago. What would be helpful is a dozen or so reliable people we can give the finished (as in laid-out, pretty) chapters to one at a time as sort of 'playtest packets' and get feedback on. We'd love actual playtest feedback (i.e. if you have the character creation chapter, actually make a few characters), as often things don't work in-game the way they read, but eyes-on reading feedback is helpful too. We're after more detailed feedback than the survey-based feedback we did previously. You'd need to set aside personal preference stuff and evaluate the content as it is--i.e. if you don't like the 'idea' of a particular approach to something, set that aside and evaluate whether it works, not whether you personally like that approach. We're not asking you to change the game to something else, just to playtest it and make sure it works and isn't broken. It would be a closed test, as we want to make sure this thing is [I]right[/I] before we put out public previews. Timescales would be tight--we'd need feedback a couple of weeks after each packet drops (although there may be longer gaps between packets, mainly depending on layout speeds). Thoughts? Would any folk here be interested in participating? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition (A5E)
Would you participate in a closed Voidrunner playtest?
Top