Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 5596893" data-attributes="member: 29398">I'm bored this afternoon so I've made an attempt to tally up the responses so far.&nbsp; I've probably misinterpreted various people's opinions, but all I had to go on was your posts above...The number sequence reads as Y-N-M where Y = Yes, N = No, and M = Maybe including answers with lots of qualifiers and everything else I couldn't find a yes or no in.&nbsp; The totals are not always the same as not everybody answered every point.1. 8-7-6.2. 9-5-7.&nbsp; These two questions kinda go together, some are fine with either way, one or two don't like either way, and most went with one or the other.3. 11-5-5.&nbsp; Surprisingly high yes vote on this one; tone it back to spells take less than a round and I suspect you won't be far from unanimity.4.&nbsp; 13-2-7.&nbsp; Is this a blip or an early signal of a desire to move away from grid-based gaming?&nbsp; Most decisive vote of the lot.5.&nbsp; 12-6-3.&nbsp; Not as decisive as it looks as some of the Ys had reservations about how it would work in the long run; whether the PCs would come out on the short end.6.&nbsp; 10-7-4.&nbsp; This one surprises me, when I read the question I thought there'd be a huge 'no' vote.&nbsp; Interesting.7.&nbsp; 4-9-8.&nbsp; Given the apparent trend toward simplifying things, no surprise here.&nbsp; Only question where N beats Y.8.&nbsp; 7-5-9.&nbsp; Most see this one as situational to campaign.9.&nbsp; 12-3-7.&nbsp; Another decisive one, some again see it as situational to campaign but not as much as the sanity question.10.&nbsp; 9-6-6.&nbsp; Pleasant surprise from my perspective as I thought this would get shredded.&nbsp; Bring on those magic surges! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />11.&nbsp; 2-1-1.&nbsp; As this one (regarding graduated effects on a failed/made save) wasn't on the original list not everyone saw it.Lan-&quot;your league statistician&quot;-efan</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lanefan, post: 5596893, member: 29398"] I'm bored this afternoon so I've made an attempt to tally up the responses so far. I've probably misinterpreted various people's opinions, but all I had to go on was your posts above... The number sequence reads as Y-N-M where Y = Yes, N = No, and M = Maybe including answers with lots of qualifiers and everything else I couldn't find a yes or no in. The totals are not always the same as not everybody answered every point. 1. 8-7-6. 2. 9-5-7. These two questions kinda go together, some are fine with either way, one or two don't like either way, and most went with one or the other. 3. 11-5-5. Surprisingly high yes vote on this one; tone it back to spells take less than a round and I suspect you won't be far from unanimity. 4. 13-2-7. Is this a blip or an early signal of a desire to move away from grid-based gaming? Most decisive vote of the lot. 5. 12-6-3. Not as decisive as it looks as some of the Ys had reservations about how it would work in the long run; whether the PCs would come out on the short end. 6. 10-7-4. This one surprises me, when I read the question I thought there'd be a huge 'no' vote. Interesting. 7. 4-9-8. Given the apparent trend toward simplifying things, no surprise here. Only question where N beats Y. 8. 7-5-9. Most see this one as situational to campaign. 9. 12-3-7. Another decisive one, some again see it as situational to campaign but not as much as the sanity question. 10. 9-6-6. Pleasant surprise from my perspective as I thought this would get shredded. Bring on those magic surges! :) 11. 2-1-1. As this one (regarding graduated effects on a failed/made save) wasn't on the original list not everyone saw it. Lan-"your league statistician"-efan [/QUOTE]

Verification